Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Positive algorithmic bias cannot stop fragmentation in homophilic networks

Bibliographic Data

ID10142595
AuthorsChris Blex (Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK), Taha Yasseri (0000-0002-1800-6094, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume46
Issue1
Pages80-97
Publication date2020-09-13
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Mathematical Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-250X • E-ISSN: 1545-5874
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0022250x.2020.1818078
OpenAlexW2999628059
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited49

Fragmentation, echo chambers, and their amelioration in social networks have been a growing concern in the academic and non-academic world. This paper shows how, under the assumption of homophily, echo chambers and fragmentation are system-immanent phenomena of highly flexible social networks, even under ideal conditions for heterogeneity. We achieve this by finding an analytical, network-based solution to the Schelling model and by proving that weak ties do not hinder the process. Furthermore, we derive that no level of positive algorithmic bias in the form of rewiring is capable of preventing fragmentation and its effect on reducing the fragmentation speed is negligible

Distributed computing · Fragmentation (computing · Homophily · Physics · Statistical physics · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Computer Science · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Echo Chamber

    Open Access•Sibel Fügan VAROL•The journal of academic social…•2022

  • Home Team Effect and Opinion Network after the Sewol Ferry Disaster

    Open Access•Ki Woong Cho•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Writer movements between news outlets reflect political polarization in media

    Open Access•Nick Hagar, Johannes Wachs et al.•New Media & Society•2021

  • Measuring the communication between multiple digital political echo chambers

    Open Access•Eglantina Kalluçi, Ridvan Peshkopia•Journal of Computational Social…•2025

  • Invasiveness, Intrusiveness and Influence

    Open Access•Eglantina Kalluçi, Ridvan Peshkopia•Social Network Analysis and Mining•2024

  • Advances in Group Processes

    Open Access•Edward J Lawler, Shane R Thye•Advances in Group Processes,…•2000

  • Republic

    Cass R Sunstein•#Republic•2017

  • The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election

    Open Access•Lada A Adamic, Natalie Glance•Proceedings of the 3rd…•2005

  • Mixing beliefs among interacting agents

    Guillaume Deffuant, David Neau et al.•Advances in Complex Systems•2000

  • Ideological Segregation Online and Offline

    Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse M Shapiro•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2011

  • Greater Internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups

    Open Access•Levi Boxell, Matthew Gentzkow et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2017

  • Understanding the social context of the Schelling segregation model

    Open Access•W A V Clark, Mark Fossett•Proceedings of the National…•2008

  • Tweeting From Left to Right

    Open Access•Pablo Barberá Aresté, Pablo Barberá et al.•Psychological Science•2015

  • Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook

    Open Access•Eytan Bakshy, Messing et al.•Science•2015

  • Modularity and community structure in networks

    Open Access•M E J Newman•Proceedings of the National…•2006

  • Freedom and control in modern society

    Morroe Berger•Freedom and control in modern…•1978

  • The echo chamber is overstated

    Elizabeth Dubois, Grant Blank•Information Communication & Society•2018

  • Red Media, Blue Media

    Open Access•Sharad Iyengar, Kyu S Hahn•Journal of Communication•2009

  • Dynamic Debates

    Open Access•Sarita Yardi, Drick Boyd et al.•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2010

  • Don’t mention it

    Open Access•A Marin•Social Networks•2012

  • Explaining the Emergence of Political Fragmentation on Social Media

    Open Access•J Bright•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2018

  • Threshold Models of Diversity

    Mark Granovetter, Roland Soong•Sociological Methodology•1988

  • A Dynamic Model of Residential Segregation

    Junfu Zhang•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•2004

  • Dynamic models of segregation

    Thomas C Schelling•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•1971

  • Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together

    Open Access•Pablo Barberá Aresté, Pablo Barberá•Political Analysis•2015

  • The Dissemination of Culture

    Open Access•Robert Axelrod•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1997

  • Of Echo Chambers and Contrarian Clubs

    Open Access•C Vaccari, Augusto Valeriani et al.•Social Media + Society•2016

  • Birds of a Feather

    Miller Mcpherson, L Smith-Lovin et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•2001

  • The Strength of Weak Ties

    Mark Granovetter, Mark S Granovetter•American Journal of Sociology•1973

Citations per year1
Citation span2021 - 2025 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae