Pluralistic ignorance of stigma impedes take-up of welfare benefits
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10155359 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alice Lee-Yoon (0000-0002-0196-0092, corresponding author), Shenghao Wu (0000-0001-9083-0785, Anderson University - South Carolina), Sherry J Wu, Jason C Chin (0000-0001-6881-6709, Nia Association), Heather M Caruso (0000-0001-9667-7574, University of California, Los Angeles), Eugene M Caruso (0000-0002-2406-2981, Anderson University - South Carolina) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 129 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 850-869 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1037/pspa0000466 |
| PMID | 40920540 |
| OpenAlex | W4414081441 |
| Language | EN |
For the past decade, the United States spent hundreds of billions of dollars annually on public welfare programs, yet over 30% of eligible individuals do not access benefits distributed through these programs. We propose that a key barrier to program participation is miscalibrated perception of public stigma-individuals' pessimistic impressions of the stigma with which the general public regards welfare-eligible people. First, we examine how people's own attitudes toward a welfare-eligible individual compare to their estimates of parallel attitudes among their peers and among the general public. Study 1 specifically categorizes spontaneous reactions to learning someone is eligible for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits: stigma, negativity about help-seeking, pity, envy, willingness to help, happiness, and admiration. Using these seven dimensions, Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate widespread pluralistic ignorance of welfare stigma: Participants believed that they held more positive, and less negative, attitudes toward SNAP-eligible individuals than did their peers or the American public. Studies 3A and 3B utilize established, incentive-compatible designs from the pluralistic ignorance literature to reveal that participants held less negative personal views about the SNAP-eligible population than they believed others did. Study 4 demonstrates the causal potential of perceived public stigma to reduce individuals' intentions to apply for SNAP and to refer the program to peers. Study 5 tests an intervention with a SNAP-eligible population to demonstrate that perceived public stigma can indeed be decreased, although the observed decreases were not sufficient to increase near-term SNAP application or referral tendencies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)
Ignorance · Intervention (counseling · Perception · Pessimism · Population · Social stigma · Stigma (botany · Welfare · Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations · Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |