Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Pluralistic ignorance of stigma impedes take-up of welfare benefits

Bibliographic Data

ID10155359
AuthorsAlice Lee-Yoon (0000-0002-0196-0092, corresponding author), Shenghao Wu (0000-0001-9083-0785, Anderson University - South Carolina), Sherry J Wu, Jason C Chin (0000-0001-6881-6709, Nia Association), Heather M Caruso (0000-0001-9667-7574, University of California, Los Angeles), Eugene M Caruso (0000-0002-2406-2981, Anderson University - South Carolina)
Year2025
Volume129
Issue5
Pages850-869
Publication date2025-09-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037/pspa0000466
PMID40920540
OpenAlexW4414081441
LanguageEN

For the past decade, the United States spent hundreds of billions of dollars annually on public welfare programs, yet over 30% of eligible individuals do not access benefits distributed through these programs. We propose that a key barrier to program participation is miscalibrated perception of public stigma-individuals' pessimistic impressions of the stigma with which the general public regards welfare-eligible people. First, we examine how people's own attitudes toward a welfare-eligible individual compare to their estimates of parallel attitudes among their peers and among the general public. Study 1 specifically categorizes spontaneous reactions to learning someone is eligible for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits: stigma, negativity about help-seeking, pity, envy, willingness to help, happiness, and admiration. Using these seven dimensions, Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate widespread pluralistic ignorance of welfare stigma: Participants believed that they held more positive, and less negative, attitudes toward SNAP-eligible individuals than did their peers or the American public. Studies 3A and 3B utilize established, incentive-compatible designs from the pluralistic ignorance literature to reveal that participants held less negative personal views about the SNAP-eligible population than they believed others did. Study 4 demonstrates the causal potential of perceived public stigma to reduce individuals' intentions to apply for SNAP and to refer the program to peers. Study 5 tests an intervention with a SNAP-eligible population to demonstrate that perceived public stigma can indeed be decreased, although the observed decreases were not sufficient to increase near-term SNAP application or referral tendencies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)

Ignorance · Intervention (counseling · Perception · Pessimism · Population · Social stigma · Stigma (botany · Welfare · Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations · Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae