Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reactions to penalties for offenses committed by the police and public citizens

Testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice

Bibliographic Data

ID10162211
AuthorsN T Feather (0000-0003-2016-382X, Flinders University, corresponding author)
Year1998
Volume75
Issue2
Pages528-544
Publication date1998-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037//0022-3514.75.2.528
PMID9731323
OpenAlexW2060018123
LanguageEN
Citations received21
References cited8

This research investigated situations involving the police and public citizens in which both committed offenses and were punished. Participants responded to either a scenario describing police violence against a "green" protester (n = 177) or one describing dangerous driving by detectives leading to injury of juveniles in a car chase (n = 149). Results showed that information about following orders mitigated participants' reactions to offenses committed by authority figures. The perceived seriousness of the offenses committed by police authorities was negatively related to participants' level of right-wing authoritarianism and positively related to the importance participants assigned to universalism values. These relations were opposite in direction for the public offenders who refused to obey a police order. Other relations supported a social-cognitive process model in which values, responsibility, seriousness, and deservingness are key variables

Authoritarianism · Criminal justice · Criminology · Democracy · Economic Justice · Political science · Retributive justice · Seriousness · Cultural Differences and Values · Law · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Deservingness and emotions

    N T Feather•European Review of Social…•2006

  • Retributive versus compensatory justice

    Open Access•Jan-Willem Van Prooijen, Jan‐Willem van Prooijen•European Journal of Social…•2010

  • Reactions to an offense in relation to authoritarianism, knowledge about risk, and freedom of action

    Open Access•N T Feather, Robert J Boeckmann et al.•European Journal of Social…•2001

  • Retributive justice and social categorizations

    Open Access•Jan-Willem Van Prooijen, Jerôme Lam•European Journal of Social…•2007

  • Distinguishing between deservingness and entitlement

    Open Access•N T Feather•European Journal of Social…•2003

  • Punishment as restoration of group and offender values following a transgression

    Open Access•Tyler G Okimoto, Michael Wenzel•European Journal of Social…•2009

  • Judgments of Deservingness

    Open Access•N T Feather•Personality and Social Psychology…•1999

  • The Psychology of Deservingness and Acceptance of Human Rights

    Carolyn L Hafer•Justice and Conflicts•2011

  • Influência social, atribuição de causalidade e julgamentos de responsabilidade e justiça

    Open Access•Aroldo Rodrigues, Eveline Maria Leal Assmar•Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica•2003

  • Authoritarian dynamics and unethical decision making

    Leanne S Son Hing, D Ramona Bobocel et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2007

  • Retributive and restorative justice

    Michael Wenzel, Tyler G Okimoto et al.•Law and Human Behavior•2007

  • Beyond Retribution

    Open Access•Tyler G Okimoto, Michael Wenzel et al.•Social Justice Research•2009

  • Retribution as Revenge and Retribution as Just Deserts

    Open Access•Monica M Gerber, Jonathan Jackson•Social Justice Research•2013

  • Why We Punish in the Name of Justice

    Open Access•Michael Wenzel, Ines Thielmann•Social Justice Research•2006

  • Revenge, Retribution, and Values

    Open Access•Ian R Mckee, Ian Mckee et al.•Social Justice Research•2008

  • Analyzing Relative Deprivation in Relation to Deservingness, Entitlement and Resentment

    Open Access•N T Feather•Social Justice Research•2015

  • Perceived Legitimacy of Judicial Authorities in Relation to Degree of Value Discrepancy with Public Citizens

    Open Access•N T Feather, Robert J Boeckmann•Social Justice Research•2013

  • The authoritarian personality model of punitiveness is inconsistent in predicting punishment preferences

    Open Access•Andrzej Uhl, Malia M Marks et al.•Political Psychology•2025

  • The Dimensionality of Right‐Wing Authoritarianism

    Open Access•Friedrich Funke•Political Psychology•2005

  • The Dark Side of Gemeinschaft

    Open Access•Elaine Barclay, Joseph F Donnermeyer et al.•Crime Prevention and Community…•2004

  • A Multilevel Analysis of the Effects of Parents, Teachers and Schools on Student Values

    Open Access•Brian Astill, Brian R Astill et al.•Social Psychology of Education•2002

  • The psychology of interpersonal relations.

    Fritz Heider•1958

  • The defendant's dilemma

    Herman E Mitchell, Herman Mitchell et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1973

  • Allocating scarce resources

    Open Access•Linda J Skitka, Linda Skitka et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1992

  • On the primacy of affect

    Robert B Zajonc•American Psychologist•1984

  • Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit

    Edwin P Hollander•Psychological Review•1958

  • Authoritarianism, Religious Fundamentalism, Quest, and Prejudice

    Bob Altemeyer, Bruce Hunsberger•International Journal for the…•1992

Citations per year0.78
Citation span1999 - 2025 (27)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae