Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Political Obligation and the United States Supreme Court

Bibliographic Data

ID10190071
AuthorsMark Hall (0000-0002-1399-8362), George Klosko (0000-0002-7792-7344)
Year1998
Volume60
Issue2
Pages462-480
Publication date1998-05-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3816 • E-ISSN: 1468-2508
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2307/2647918
OpenAlexW2040743938
LanguageEN
References cited27

We inquire into reasons given by the United States Supreme Court to explain political obligations, in order to assess different theories of political obligation that are currently advanced. The justices have most often grounded moral requirements to obey the law on protection individuals receive from society. The most likely bases of these "reciprocal obligations" are an idea of reciprocity as itself a binding moral notion and, more specifically, the principle of fairness. Although the evidence is somewhat unclear, on balance, it supports the more specific fairness interpretation

Law and economics · Moral obligation · Obligation · Political science · Politics · Reciprocal · Reciprocity (cultural anthropology · Sociology · Supreme court · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Anarchy, State, and Utopia

    Robert Nozick•Anarchy, State, and Utopia•1975

  • Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics

    Norman Daniels•The Journal of Philosophy•1979

  • Sidgwick and Reflective Equilibrium

    Peter Singer, Sherwood J B Sugden•The Monist•1974

  • Parfit's Moral Arithmetic and the Obligation to Obey the Law

    Open Access•George Klosko•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•1990

  • A Theory of Justice

    John Rawls•Theory of Justice•1971

  • On the Function of False Hypotheses in Ethics

    C D Broad•The International Journal of Ethics•1916

  • Moral Principles and Political Obligations

    Open Access•A John Simmons•Moral Principles and Political…•1980

  • Associative Political Obligations

    A John Simmons•Ethics•1996

  • Consent theory of political obligation

    George Klosko•Routledge Handbook of the Ethics…•2018

  • Anarchy, State, and Utopia

    Robert Nozick•Princeton Readings in Political…•2018

  • The Consent Theory of Political Obligation

    Harry Beran•Consent Theory of Political…•2019

  • Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism

    David Lyons•Forms and limits of utilitarianism.•1965

  • Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics

    John Rawls•The Philosophical Review•1951

  • Are There Any Natural Rights

    H L A Hart•The Philosophical Review•1955

  • Political Thought and the American Judiciary

    Milton M Klein, H L Phohlman•American Journal of Legal History•1994

  • What Would Happen if Everybody Acted like Me

    Open Access•A C Ewing•Philosophy•1953

  • Political Obligation and the Natural Duties of Justice

    Open Access•George Klosko•Philosophy & Public Affairs•1994

  • Rawls's Theory of Justice

    Open Access•John W Chapman•American Political Science Review•1975

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae