Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Defending Elections Against the Oligarchic Charge

Bibliographic Data

ID10191068
AuthorsPalle Bech-Pedersen (0000-0002-3579-2170, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume88
Issue2
Pages000-000
Publication date2025-01-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3816 • E-ISSN: 1468-2508
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/735028
OpenAlexW4406955599
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited28

This article counters the claim, advanced by lottocrats, that elections are inherently oligarchic. I begin by examining the theory of elections that sees them as a superior mechanism for selecting candidates, showing that this implication fails to render elections as inherently oligarchic because superiority is context dependent. Next, I demonstrate that the advantage of wealth arising from the cost of disseminating information is empirically contingent and, thus, not attributable to the nature of elections. I then offer a pathway for the deoligarchization of elections, distinguishing between doxastic and structural obstacles to inclusion. I demonstrate how ideology critique and certain structural reforms offer solutions to these obstacles. I conclude by addressing the rebuttal that elections remain very likely to be oligarchic and that sortition fares comparatively better on this front. I argue that this line of argument overlooks the undemocratic implications and risks of oligarchization that would emerge from adopting sortition.

Charge (physics · Economics · Physics · Political economy · Political science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Political Economy and Marxism · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • The Right to Stand and the Democratic Value of Elections

    Open Access•Annabelle Lever•Constellations•2026

  • Trade unions, not tribunates

    Open Access•Lore-Marie Junghans•European Journal of Political…•2025

  • The Principles of Representative Government

    Open Access•Bernard Manin•Principles of Representative…•1997

  • Sozialphilosophie

    R Jaeggi, Robin Celikates•Sozialphilosophie•2017

  • Rethinking Ideology

    Open Access•R Jaeggi•New Waves in Political Philosophy•2009

  • Against Anti-Democratic Shortcuts

    Open Access•Cristina Lafont•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2020

  • The Price of Democracy

    Julia Cagé•Price of Democracy•2020

  • Is Random Selection a Cure for the Ills of Electoral Representation

    Open Access•Dimitri Landa, Ryan Pevnick•Journal of Political Philosophy•2020

  • Lottocracy and deliberative accountability

    Open Access•Hubertus Buchstein•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2021

  • A militant defence of democracy

    Open Access•Cristina Lafont•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2021

  • Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter

    Open Access•Nicholas Carnes•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2012

  • What Voters Want

    Open Access•Rosie Campbell, Patrick Cowley et al.•Political Studies•2014

  • Against Elections

    Open Access•Alexander A Guerrero, Alexander Guerrero•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2014

  • Representation, Bicameralism, Political Equality, and Sortition

    Open Access•Arash Abizadeh•Perspectives on Politics•2021

  • Not just money

    Lea Elsässer, Svenja Hense et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2021

  • Against Lottocracy

    Open Access•Lachlan Umbers•European Journal of Political…•2021

  • Lottocracy or psephocracy? Democracy, elections, and random selection

    Open Access•Daniel Hutton Ferris•European Journal of Political…•2025

  • On Voluntary Servitude and the Theory of Ideology

    Open Access•Michael Rosen, Michael A Rosen•Constellations•2000

  • Lot and Democratic Representation

    Open Access•Alex Zakaras•Constellations•2010

  • Careerists Versus Coal-Miners

    Open Access•Tom O’grady, Tom O''Grady•Comparative Political Studies•2019

  • The Social Background of Political Decision-Makers

    Donald R Matthews•The American Catholic Sociological…•1954

  • Do Voters Dislike Working-Class Candidates? Voter Biases and the Descriptive Underrepresentation of the Working Class

    Open Access•Nicholas Carnes, Noam Lupu•American Political Science Review•2016

  • Sortition, Rotation, and Mandate

    Open Access•David Owens, David Owen et al.•Latin American Politics and Society•2018

  • Random Assemblies for Lawmaking? Prospects and Limits

    Open Access•James S Fishkin, James Fishkin•Latin American Politics and Society•2018

  • From Deliberative to Radical Democracy? Sortition and Politics in the Twenty-First Century

    Open Access•Yves Sintomer•Latin American Politics and Society•2018

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae