Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Interpreting Humani Generis

The Evolution Controversy in the Melbourne Catholic Press, 1960–61

Bibliographic Data

ID10199059
AuthorsJoel Barnes (0000-0002-6113-7620, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume48
Issue2
Pages201-214
Publication date2024-05-31
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Religious History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-4227 • E-ISSN: 1467-9809
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1467-9809.13060
OpenAlexW4399235361
LanguageEN

From mid‐1960 to early 1961, the Melbourne Catholic weekly newspaper The Advocate carried an extended controversy on evolutionary science and its compatibility with the teachings of the Church. An intra‐denominational debate among Catholic scientists, clergy and laymen, the controversy was shaped by the theological framework of Pope Pius XII's encyclical Humani Generis (1950), which included the first ever papal statement on evolution. As a grassroots debate in which official Catholic policy as outlined in the encyclical was open to interpretation by competing interests, the controversy serves as an index of the ambiguities of Humani Generis , and of the uncertainties of wider Church policy at the time, regarding evolutionary science and human evolution in particular. The article considers the Advocate controversy and its immediate aftermath within the context of Humani Generis 's strictures on human evolution, and within the longer history of Catholic responses to and engagement with evolutionary science

Environmental ethics · History of Science and Natural History · Philosophy · Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae