Some Effects of Expectation on Evaluation of Recorded Musical Performance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10200686 |
|---|---|
| Authors | George L Duerksen (University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1972 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 268-272 |
| Publication date | 1972-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Research in Music Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-4294 • E-ISSN: 1945-0095 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3344093 |
| OpenAlex | W2140729245 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 20 |
passive receiver. The individual, on the contrary, is 'prepared,' either implicitly or explicitly, for certain kinds of input; the input is actively dealt with on the basis of this preparation. The fate of any input is at least partly dependent on the nature of the preparation.1 Applying Dember's theory in a musical context, the present study examined the effect of two different explicit preparations on evaluations of the same performance by groups of college music and nonmusic majors. Music and nonmusic majors were assumed to have different implicit preparations. Two questions were asked: (1) Is there any difference in the way listeners rate a recorded musical performance when told it is a professional performance and when told it is a student performance? (2) Is there any difference between the ratings assigned by music majors and nonmusic majors listening under the same conditions? It seemed reasonable to assume that if the differing information was believed by the subjects, it would lead to differing expectations in listening. If so, the professional performance would probably be expected to be superior. It is possible that the music majors' background might make them less subject than nonmusic majors to influence by the explicit preparation used in this study. It is also possible, however, that the music majors would expect to hear more and finer differences between the professional and the student performances, and thus be even more subject than nonmusic majors to influence by explicit preparation
Active listening · Art · Cognitive psychology · Context (archaeology · Mathematics education · Music education · Music psychology · Musical · Pedagogy · Significant difference · Statistics · Subject (documents · Visual arts · Communication · Computer Science · Diverse Music Education Insights · Mathematics · Music Technology and Sound Studies · Neuroscience and Music Perception · Psychology
Perception of a Comprovisation
Psychology for Musicians
Perception of Structure in Collective Free Improvisation and its Context Dependency
Old instruments or new? Listeners’ preferences for Baroque violin music performed on period and modern instruments
Evaluations of solo piano performances
Research on the assessment of music performance from Maria Manturzewska’s early experiments to more recent studies
Rater fairness in music performance assessment
Seeing or hearing the pianists? A synopsis of an early audiovisual perception experiment and a replication
Psychometric properties and standard-setting study of the Piano Performance Test for prospective teachers
Consistency in Piano Performance Evaluation
Effects of Televised Instruction on Student Music Selection, Music Skills, and Attitudes
Influence of Selected Variables on Solo and Small-Ensemble Festival Ratings
Effect of Majority Consensus on Preferences for Recorded Orchestral and Popular Music
Performer, Rater, Occasion, and Sequence as Sources of Variability in Music Performance Assessment
The Effect of Selected Nonmusical Factors on Adjudicators’ Ratings of High School Solo Vocal Performances
Generic Style Music Preferences of Fifth-Grade Students
The Effect of Appropriate and Inappropriate In-Class Song Performance Models on Performance Preference of Third- and Fourth-Grade Students
The Effects of Score Use on Musicians’ Ratings of Choral Performances
Internal Consistency of Performance Evaluations as a Function of Music Expertise and Excerpt Familiarity
The Effect of Disc Jockey, Peer, and Music Teacher Approval of Music on Music Selection and Preference
| Unique citing works | 20 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,42 |
| Citation span | 1978 - 2025 (48) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 19 |