Moral dilemmas, moral reasoning, and genital herpes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10205751 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Terri D Conley (0000-0001-8434-8781, University of California, Los Angeles, corresponding author), Rosemary A Jadack (The Ohio State University), Janet Shibley Hyde (0000-0001-7372-3902, University of Wisconsin–Madison) |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 256-266 |
| Publication date | 1997-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Sex Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-4499 • E-ISSN: 1559-8519 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00224499709551892 |
| OpenAlex | W2033465898 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 24 |
The moral reasoning of 30 persons with genital herpes and 29 persons with no sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) was examined. Participants with herpes were recruited by advertising in the community, whereas participants in the non‐herpes group were recruited from an introductory psychology class at a local junior college and from a pool of community members who volunteered to participate in paid psychological experiments. Moral reasoning was examined by assessing reactions to dilemmas about STDs and Kohlbergian moral dilemmas. The participants' Kohlbergian level of moral reasoning was assessed using the Kohlberg moral stage model. The moral orientation of the participants was assessed using Gilligan's moral orientation model, which distinguishes between justice and care reasoning. Based on Kohlberg's and Gilligan's theories, the hypotheses of the study were that participants would respond with the same moral reasoning level and the same moral orientation across all dilemmas, persons with genital herpes would reason at the same level of moral reasoning as those who have not experienced genital herpes, and women would score lower in moral stage and would use a moral orientation of care to a greater extent than men. Results indicate that, in general, people reasoned at a consistent moral stage across all dilemmas. Also, participants were more likely to use a care orientation in the STD dilemmas than in the Kohlbergian dilemmas. Persons with genital herpes had higher moral reasoning scores on the STD dilemmas than did persons without any STDs and were more likely to use a care orientation in their responses to these dilemmas. No gender differences were found
Developmental psychology · Genital herpes · Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development · Moral development · Moral dilemma · Moral reasoning · Orientation (vector space · Ethics in Business and Education · Ethics in medical practice · Immunology · Medicine · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology
The Ucla Multidimensional Condom Attitudes Scale
A Longitudinal Study of Moral Judgment
Sex Differences in the Development of Moral Reasoning
Two Perspectives
In a Different Voice
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Estimating gender differences in the comprehension and preference of moral issues
Genital Herpes
Women, Men, and Condoms
Sex Differences in Moral Judgments? A Test of Gilligan's Theory
Gender differences in moral development
Sexuality Today
In a different voice
Gender differences in moral reasoning
Sex differences in the course of personality development
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,11 |
| Citation span | 1998 - 2011 (14) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |