Sexual Arousal-Delay Discounting
When Condoms Delay Arousal
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10210341 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nioud Mulugeta Gebru (0000-0002-9335-2667, Center for Alcohol and Addictions Studies, Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health), Val Wongsomboon (0000-0002-9467-9952, Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 727-741 |
| Publication date | 2023-07-28 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Sex Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-4499 • E-ISSN: 1559-8519 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00224499.2023.2239216 |
| PMID | 37506314 |
| OpenAlex | W4385335612 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 39 |
Sexual arousal plays an important role in condom use decisions. However, combined effects of reduced sexual arousal and delay to achieving arousal on condom use decisions remain understudied. This study used a novel sexual arousal-delay discounting (SADD) task to measure individuals' willingness to use a condom in situations where condom use would (1) delay time to arousal and (2) reduce the level of arousal one could achieve even after the delay (e.g., 5 minutes to reach 50% arousal). In Study 1, U.S. college students (N = 115; M age = 18.6) reported their willingness to have sex with a condom in hypothetical scenarios where the condom delayed and reduced their partner's sexual arousal. In Study 2, U.S. college students (N = 208; M age = 19.6; 99% ≤ 24 years old) completed the same task for two partners-partner perceived as most desirable and partner perceived as least likely to have an STI. In this study, a condom would affect either participants' own or partner's arousal. Study 3 replicated Study 2 using a non-college sample in the U.S. (N = 227; M age = 30.5; 84% ≥ 25 years old). Across studies, willingness to use a condom decreased as the delay to reduced arousal increased. This effect of SADD was stronger when condoms reduced participants' own (vs. partner's) arousal, whereas comparisons between most desirable and least likely-to-have-STI partners provided mixed findings. Men had higher discounting rates than women across conditions. Greater SADD was associated with lower condom use self-efficacy, providing initial evidence for the task's validity. The role of delayed arousal in condom use and implications are discussed
Arousal · Audiology · Delay discounting · Developmental psychology · Discounting · Economics · Sexual arousal · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Medicine · Psychology · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology · Social Psychology
Type of Sexual Activity Impacts the Discounting of “Safe Sex”
Been There, Done That
Investigating the influence of partner attitudes, norms and risk behavior on condom use decision-making during penile-vaginal sex with casual partners
Long Stretch of Singlehood Ahead? Unpacking the Roles of Anticipated Singlehood Duration and Singlehood Stigma in Lowering Dating Standards
An algorithm for identifying nonsystematic delay-discounting data.
The Behavioral Economics of Substance Use Disorders
Area Under the Curve as a Measure of Discounting
Measuring Sexual Risk-Taking
Condom Carnival
Improving sexual health for young people
The Main Concern is HIV, Everything Else is Fixable”
Examining Delay Discounting of Condom-Protected Sex Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Using Crowdsourcing Technology
Incomplete Use of Condoms
Delay Discounting for HIV/STI Testing
The Role of Young Adults’ Pleasure Attitudes in Shaping Condom Use
Sexual Arousal Discounting
Sexual Negotiation, HIV-Status Disclosure, and Sexual Risk Behavior Among Latino Men Who Use the Internet to Seek Sex with Other Men
Devaluation of Safe Sex by Delay or Uncertainty
Sexual Pleasure and Condom Use
Predictors of Condom Use Self-Efficacy in an Ethnically Diverse University Sample
Waiting for medical test results
A Discounting Framework for Choice With Delayed and Probabilistic Rewards
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |