The opportunities and limits of open science for LGBTIQ+ research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10219834 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Emily A Leskinen (0000-0002-3445-9886, School of Social Science and Human Services Ramapo College of New Jersey Mahwah New Jersey USA, corresponding author), Sharon G Horne (0000-0002-8197-7467, Department of Counseling, School Psychology and Sport University of Massachusetts Boston Boston USA), William S Ryan (0000-0003-0158-3810, Department of Psychology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada), Jojanneke Van Der Toorn (0000-0003-0476-772X, Institute of Psychology Leiden University Leiden Netherlands) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 80 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 1000-1021 |
| Publication date | 2024-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Social Issues (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-4537 • E-ISSN: 1540-4560 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/josi.12636 |
| OpenAlex | W4402458003 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 99 |
The open science (OS) movement has the potential to fundamentally shape how researchers conduct research and distribute findings. However, the implications for research on lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex, and queer/questioning (LGBTIQ+) experiences present unique considerations. In this paper, included in the special issue on Reimagining LGBTIQ+ Research , we explore how the OS movement broadens access to and comprehension of LGBTIQ+ experiences while simultaneously imposing limitations on the representation of these identities and raising concerns about risks to LGBTIQ+ researchers and participants. Our research focuses on three facets of the OS movement. First, we examine practices related to open data, which advocates that data should be accessible to other researchers to analyze. Yet, providing access to such data challenges may compromise trust between the research team and study participants. Second, we examine practices related to open replicable research, particularly as it has the potential to both highlight and erase the experiences of groups within the LGBTIQ+ community. Finally, we consider how open access, making scholarly articles free to the public, may help educate a broader audience on the lived experiences of LGBTIQ+ people, but in regions where these identities remain heavily stigmatized and/or criminalized, access may be blocked or individuals could be penalized for retrieving this information
Sociology · African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues · Computer Science · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Psychology · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
The influence of essentialist and social constructionist notions on perceptions of “realness”
From oppressive to affirmative
Reimagining LGBTIQ+ research – Acknowledging differences across subpopulations, methods, and countries
Inclusion and protection in tension
Centering the margins
Bridging Neurodiversity and Open Scholarship
Toward inclusive and equitable LGBTIQ+ measurement
Structural stigma and sexual minority men’s depression and suicidality
Out of DSM
Digital harassment and abuse
The future of sex and gender in psychology
Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress
Structural stigma
Scientific Utopia
Promoting an open research culture
Epistemic Exploitation
The Fair Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
LGBT Activism and the Making of Europe
Integrating Qualitative Methods and Open Science
A decade of Qualitative Psychology
Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies
A review of two decades of LGBTQ‐inclusive research in JSPR and PR
Transgender stigma and health
Can we Build on Social Movement Theories to Develop and Improve Community‐Based Participatory Research? A Framework Synthesis Review
Gender in Health
Clinical activism in community-based practice
An argument for bad psychology
Many Labs 2
Queer-free majors
Researching while cisgender
Insiders and outsiders
To get the word out”
Open Science From a Qualitative, Feminist Perspective
Bridging Feminist Psychology and Open Science
Participatory action research
Sexual Orientation Change Efforts, Adverse Childhood Experiences, and Suicide Ideation and Attempt Among Sexual Minority Adults, United States, 2016–2018
From oppressive to affirmative
The damaging legacy of damage‐centered LGBTIQ+ research
Reimagining LGBTIQ+ research – Acknowledging differences across subpopulations, methods, and countries
Inclusion and protection in tension
Conducting research within the acronym
Toward inclusive and equitable LGBTIQ+ measurement
Public perceptions of prejudice research
Emergence of a transnational LGBTI psychology
The challenges and promises of transnational LGBTQ psychology
Mapping the Margins
Lessons from a community-based participatory research study with transgender and gender nonconforming youth and their families
Data for queer lives
Measurement, methods, and divergent patterns
How different are the adult children of parents who have same-sex relationships? Findings from the New Family Structures Study
| Citations per year | 3.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |