Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The brevity and severity of ‘Golden Age’ piracy trials

Bibliographic Data

ID10224901
AuthorsJoseph Gibbs (0000-0003-1622-6859, American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume31
Issue4
Pages729-786
Publication date2019-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Maritime History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0843-8714 • E-ISSN: 2052-7756
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0843871419873999
OpenAlexW2992786249
LanguageEN
Citations received1

A sampling of piracy and piracy-related trials involving mainly English (later British) and colonial courts between 1670 and 1731 shows that from opening statements through deliberations they were rapid affairs, few extending beyond a single calendar date, and that on average they appear to have convicted about six of every 10 defendants who pleaded Not Guilty. That conviction figure is impacted by high-volume trials in 1700 and 1722 that acquitted relatively large numbers of defendants; eliminating these two trials from the mix yields a significantly higher conviction rate (about seven in 10) for those who pleaded Not Guilty. This article presents its sampling data, noting appropriate cautions, in the context of the era’s legal proceedings and practices

Archaeology · Context (archaeology · Conviction · Criminology · Political science · Colonialism, slavery, and trade · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law · Medieval and Early Modern Justice · Psychology

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae