Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Attorney Persuasion in the Capital Penalty Phase

A Content Analysis of Closing Arguments

Bibliographic Data

ID10228931
AuthorsMark Costanzo (Claremont McKenna College, corresponding author), Julie Longua Peterson (0000-0002-7886-869X, Claremont Graduate University), Julie Peterson (0009-0000-9902-8799)
Year1994
Volume50
Issue2
Pages125-147
Publication date1994-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Social Issues (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-4537 • E-ISSN: 1540-4560
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02413.x
OpenAlexW2046556100
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited13

Transcribed sentencing phase summations were content analyzed and comparisons were made between prosecution and defense arguments. Arguments were coded to discover the themes emphasized by attorneys in arguing for life imprisonment or the death penalty. Prosecutors portrayed the defendant as a cold, remorseless killer, emphasized the brutal nature of the murder, the suffering experienced by victims, and the moral legitimacy of revenge. Defenders explained the murders in the context of the defendant's personal history, emphasized the severity of life without the possibility of parole, and argued that the death penalty is unjust and morally wrong. Defenders provided richer accounts of the life history of the defendant and prosecutors provided more vivid accounts of the murder. Attorney arguments are discussed in light of research on communication, social cognition, and persuasion

Capital (architecture · Closing (real estate · Content (measure theory · Content analysis · Context (archaeology · Criminology · Imprisonment · Legitimacy · Life imprisonment · Persuasion · Political science · Prison · Sociology · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Deception detection and forensic psychology · History · Jury Decision Making Processes · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Adverse Childhood Experiences in Capital Sentencing

    Open Access•Tyler J Vaughan, Lisa Bell Holleran•Justice Quarterly•2023

  • Making death (in)different

    Krisda Chaemsaithong, Yoonjeong Kim et al.•Social Semiotics•2021

  • Let’s kill him”

    Krisda Chaemsaithong, Yoonjeong Kim et al.•Social Semiotics•2019

  • Precursors of lethal violence

    Open Access•Diane Freedman, David Freedman et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2000

  • Communication Yearbook 3

    Dan Nimmo•Communication Yearbook 3•1979

  • Advances In Experimental Social Psychology

    Bertram Gawronski•Advances in Experimental Social…•2022

  • Grounded theory

    David L Rennie, Jeffrey R Phillips et al.•Canadian Psychology/Psychologie…•1988

  • Increasing voting behavior by asking people if they expect to vote.

    Anthony G Greenwald, Catherine G Carnot et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•1987

  • Dimensions of Compliance-Gaining Behavior

    Gerald Marwell, David R Schmitt•Sociometry•1967

  • On sin versus sickness

    Bernard Weiner•American Psychologist•1993

  • Self-relevant scenarios as mediators of likelihood estimates and compliance

    W Larry Gregory, Robert B Cialdini et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1982

  • Evidence evaluation in complex decision making

    Nancy Pennington, Reid Hastie•Journal of Personality and Social…•1986

  • Recent psychological approaches to the free will versus determinism issue

    A A Sappington•Psychological Bulletin•1990

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0.15
Citation span2000 - 2023 (24)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae