Contributions of delay, duration, and intensity of shock on rats' choices involving conflicting‐valence consequences
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10244340 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Forrest Toegel (0000-0003-4644-5788, Department of Psychology West Virginia University Morgantown WV USA, corresponding author), Aaron D Dumas (0009-0009-6603-379X, Department of Psychology West Virginia University Morgantown WV USA), Michael Perone (0000-0003-3936-0962, Department of Psychology West Virginia University Morgantown WV USA) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 123 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 412-434 |
| Publication date | 2025-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-5002 • E-ISSN: 1938-3711 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/jeab.70008 |
| PMID | 40172949 |
| OpenAlex | W4409107034 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 34 |
Problems related to “self‐control” can occur in situations in which a single choice produces both reinforcing and aversive consequences. We exposed rats to choice situations in which a press on one lever produced only food and a press on a second lever produced food and delayed shock. Within and across conditions of four experiments, adjusting‐delay procedures were used to identify indifference points—delays at which the consequences produced by the two levers exerted equal control over choice. Experiment 1 investigated the effects of intensity and duration of delayed shock on choice between a small food reinforcer or a large food reinforcer followed by delayed shock. Experiment 3 investigated the effects of shock's delay on choice between food delivered immediately and followed by delayed shock or food delivered after a delay. Experiments 2 and 4 investigated the effects of signaling the delayed shock in Experiments 1 and 3, respectively. The effects of delayed shock on choice were a direct function of shock intensity and shock duration and an inverse function of shock's delay. Signals did not affect choice systematically. The results extend findings from research on the punishment of operant behavior and on the temporal discounting of reinforcing and punishing events
Affect (linguistics) · Audiology · Delay discounting · Developmental psychology · Duration (music) · Impulsivity · Lever · Physics · Punishment (psychology) · Reinforcement · Shock (circulatory) · Valence (chemistry) · Behavioral and Psychological Studies · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Chemistry · Communication · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology
Within‐subject Comparison of Real and Hypothetical Money Rewards in Delay Discounting
Delay Discounting
Effectiveness of Delayed Punishment on Learning Performance When Preceded by Premonitory Cues
A Classical Conditioning Procedure to Control Suppression of a Rewarded Response Punished after Delay
Attention in delay of gratification
Choosing between predictable and unpredictable shock conditions
| Highly cited | No |
|---|