Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A quantitative analysis of the effects of target‐ and alternative‐reinforcement rate on resurgence

Bibliographic Data

ID10244408
AuthorsKyleigh L Montague (0000-0002-3956-6154, Department of Psychology University of Florida Gainesville FL USA, corresponding author), Carolyn M Ritchey (0000-0001-5416-0833, Department of Psychology Georgia Southern University Statesboro GA USA), Carla N Martinez‐Perez (0000-0002-9415-0928, Department of Psychology University of Florida Gainesville FL USA), Toshikazu Kuroda (0000-0003-4331-7852, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International Seika‐cho Soraku‐gun, Kyoto Prefecture Japan), Christopher A Podlesnik (0000-0002-8614-8158, Department of Psychology University of Florida Gainesville FL USA, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume123
Issue3
Pages455-470
Publication date2025-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-5002 • E-ISSN: 1938-3711
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/jeab.70011
PMID40223556
OpenAlexW4409440776
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited71

Resurgence is defined as an increase in a previously reinforced and reduced target response when conditions worsen for a more recently reinforced alternative response. The present experiment evaluated the effects of target‐ and alternative‐reinforcer rate on resurgence in humans. We arranged combinations of contingent high‐ and low‐rate target and high‐ and low‐rate alternative reinforcement across four groups. When extinguishing all reinforcement, resurgence occurred only in groups experiencing a high rate of alternative reinforcement, with resurgence being higher in the group that experienced high rates of both target and alternative reinforcement. Our findings join those of others that indicate that rates of alternative reinforcement contribute more to resurgence than target‐reinforcer rates. A quantitative model of resurgence, resurgence as choice in context (RaC 2 ), tended to underpredict target responding and overpredict alternative responding in Phase 3. Including a misallocation parameter to account for a proportion of reinforcers misallocated between responses provided a better account of the findings

Biology · Context (archaeology) · Developmental psychology · Reinforcement · Autism Spectrum Disorder Research · Behavioral and Psychological Studies · Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Reinstatement and a resurgence‐like effect in an odor‐signaled multiple schedule in rats

    Open Access•Madeleine G Mason, Sarah Accattato et al.•Journal of the Experimental…•2026

  • On the Law of Effect 1

    Open Access•R J Herrnstein•Journal of the Experimental…•1970

  • Least-Squares Means

    Open Access•Russell V Lenth•Journal of Statistical Software•2016

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • Aggregation and beyond

    Open Access•Seymour Epstein•Journal of Personality•1983

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae