Task Effects in Irony Comprehension in English as a Foreign Language

Bibliographic Data

ID10255102
AuthorsKatarzyna Bromberek-Dyzman (0000-0002-8085-4983, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland, corresponding author), Joanna Kowalik (0000-0002-0060-4854, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland), Anna Pękacz (Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland)
Year2023
Volume66
Issue4
Pages833-850
Publication date2023-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguage and Speech (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0023-8309 • E-ISSN: 1756-6053
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/00238309221127029
PMID36475983
OpenAlexW4310938541
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited39

Irony comprehension involves understanding implicit attitudes communicated on top of the explicit, literal meaning. Because of the double-binding stemming from the explicit–implicit incongruity, irony is assumed to be cognitively taxing when communicated in the native language (NL), and even more so in the foreign language (FL). Prior studies investigating irony comprehension in the FL indicated that irony may be processed with similar speed and accuracy in the foreign and the native language, and that irony comprehension efficiency in the former might be lower. Building on these findings, this study investigates if the tasks participants perform when reading irony in their FL affect the efficiency of irony comprehension. We invited 150 advanced Polish users of English to take part in one of two tasks. Participants were asked to read 3- to 5-sentence-long-scenarios, ending in literal (Literal Praise, Literal Criticism) or ironic comments (Ironic Praise, Ironic Criticism) and to either (1) make true/false judgments (T/F task; N = 83), or to (2) judge the emotional value in emotive decision task (EDT; N = 67). A full spectrum of verbal irony employed to communicate ironic praise and criticism, and their literal equivalents: literal praise and literal criticism, was tested. A three-way mixed ANOVA with 2× Valence (Praise, Criticism), 2× Mode (Literal, Ironic) as within-subject repeated-measures, and 2× Task (True/False, Emotive Decision) as a between-subject independent measure, revealed that efficiency of irony comprehension was differently modified by the two tasks. Therefore, we argue that irony comprehension in English as a foreign language is task-constrained

Art · Comprehension · Criticism · Irony · Linguistics · Literature · Praise · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Philosophy · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access