Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Perceiving Non-Native Speech

Bibliographic Data

ID10255143
AuthorsJudith Bürki-Cohen (U.S. Department of Transportation, Boston), Joanne L Miller (Northeastern University, corresponding author), Peter D Eimas (Brown University)
Year2001
Volume44
Issue2
Pages149-169
Publication date2001-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguage and Speech (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0023-8309 • E-ISSN: 1756-6053
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/00238309010440020201
PMID11575902
OpenAlexW2013720571
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited13

In a series of experiments using monosyllabic words produced by a native and a non-native speaker of English, native English speakers monitored the wordinitial consonants of the words to decide which of two consonants was present on each trial. In some of the experiments, a secondary task of a linguistic nature, deciding whether the target-bearing word was a noun or verb, was also required. When the words were presented in silence, the native and non-native stimuli were processedin a like manner. Specifically, when the secondary task was not required, phonemic decisions tended to be made on the basis of prelexical information, whereas when the secondary task was required, they tended to be made on the basis of postlexical information(see Eimas, Marcovitz Hornstein, & Payton, 1990). However, when the listening conditions were degraded by presenting the words at a lower level and in noise, the two types of stimuli yielded different patterns. Native speech was processed as before, whereas for non-native speech phonemic decisions now tended to be made on the basis of postlexical information both when a secondary task was required and when it was not. The contrasting results for native and non-native speech are discussed in terms of models of phoneme processing

Cognitive psychology · Linguistics · Speech recognition · Communication · Computer Science · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Philosophy · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Psychology · Speech Recognition and Synthesis

  • Investigating the effect of nativeness and speaker age on the credibility of spoken sentences

    Open Access•Thanh Lan Truong, Adna Ferrin Weber et al.•Frontiers in Language Sciences•2024

  • State-of-the-Art Review Article

    Open Access•Jane Setter, Jennifer Jenkins•Language Teaching•2005

  • An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants

    George A Miller, Patricia E Nicely•The Journal of the Acoustical…•1955

  • Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability

    D N Kalikow, K N Stevens et al.•The Journal of the Acoustical…•1977

  • Merging information in speech recognition

    Open Access•Dennis Norris, James M Mcqueen et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2000

  • The TRACE model of speech perception

    Open Access•James L Mcclelland, Jeffrey L Elman•Cognitive Psychology•1986

  • Phoneme identification and the lexicon

    Open Access•Antony Cutler, Anne Cutler et al.•Cognitive Psychology•1987

  • Processing Time, Accent, and Comprehensibility in the Perception of Native and Foreign-Accented Speech

    Open Access•Murray J Munro, Tracey M Derwing•Language and Speech•1995

Citations per year0.1
Citation span2005 - 2024 (20)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae