Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Acoustic Correlates of Focus Marking in Czech and Polish

Bibliographic Data

ID10255348
AuthorsFatima Hamlaoui (0000-0003-3603-9794, University of Toronto, corresponding author), Marzena Żygis (0000-0002-2596-9171, Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin, Germany), Jack Engelmann (0000-0002-1485-7879, Berlin University of the Arts), Jonas Engelmann (Berlin University of the Arts), Michael Wagner (0000-0002-0214-2403, McGill University)
Year2019
Volume62
Issue2
Pages358-377
Publication date2019-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguage and Speech (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0023-8309 • E-ISSN: 1756-6053
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0023830918773536
PMID29781386
OpenAlexW2804163304
LanguageEN
References cited39

Languages vary in the type of contexts that affect prosodic prominence. This paper reports on a production study investigating how different types of foci influence prosody in Polish and Czech noun phrases. The results show that in both languages, focus and givenness are marked prosodically, with pitch and intensity as the main acoustic correlates. Like Germanic languages, Polish and Czech patterns show prosodic focus marking in a broad range of contexts and differ in this regard from other fixed-word-stress languages such as French. This suggests that (a) Polish and Czech are similar to Germanic languages and are unlike Romance languages in marking a variety of types of focus prosodically; (b) there is no close correlation between fixed word stress and lack of prosodic focus marking because Polish, which has fixed stress on the penult, shows prosodic focus marking for all types of focus; and (c) there is no straightforward relationship between flexible word order and whether focus and givenness are prosodically marked, contrary to earlier claims, because both Czech and Polish, with their relatively flexible word order, are more similar to English than Romance languages

Czech · Focus (optics · German · Germanic languages · Linguistics · Physics · Prosody · Romance languages · Stress (linguistics · Variety (cybernetics · Word order · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Philosophy · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Intonation and Meaning

    Daneel Buring, Daniel Büring•Intonation and Meaning•2016

  • Intonational Phonology

    Open Access•D Robert Ladd•Intonational Phonology•2008

  • Intonation

    Open Access•Alan Cruttenden•Intonation•1997

  • Loudness predicts prominence

    Greg Kochanski, Esther Grabe et al.•The Journal of the Acoustical…•2005

  • LmerTest

    Alexandra Kuznetsova, Per B Brockhoff et al.•CRAN: Contributed Packages•2013

  • Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing

    Open Access•Dale J Barr, Roger Levy et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2013

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • Information Structure and Sentence Form

    Open Access•Knud Lambrecht•Information Structure and…•1994

  • Polish stress

    Open Access•Luiza Newlin-Łukowicz, Luiza Newlin‐łukowicz•Phonology•2012

  • A Phonological Model of French Intonation

    Sun-Ah Jun, Sun‐ah Jun et al.•Intonation•2000

  • The role of givenness, presupposition, and prosody in Czech word order

    Open Access•Radek Šimík, Marta Wierzba•Semantics and Pragmatics•2015

  • Givenness and Locality

    Open Access•Michael Wagner•Proceedings from Semantics and…•2006

  • Focus as prosodic alignment

    Open Access•Caroline Fery•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2013

  • Contrastive focus vs. discourse-new

    Open Access•Jonah Katz, Elisabeth Selkirk•Language•2011

  • Deaccentuation of Words Representing ‘Given’ Information

    Open Access•Jacques Terken, Julia Hirschberg•Language and Speech•1994

  • On the Prosodic Expression of Pragmatic Prominence

    Open Access•Frank Kügler, Susanne Genzel•Language and Speech•2012

  • The Distribution of Pitch Accents in Instructions as a Function of Discourse Structure

    Open Access•Jacques Terken, J M B Terken•Language and Speech•1984

  • Acoustical Characteristics of Sentential Focus

    Open Access•Stephen J Eady, William E Cooper et al.•Language and Speech•1986

  • Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin

    Open Access•Yi Xu•Journal of Phonetics•1997

  • A grid theory of stress in polish

    Open Access•Jerzy Rubach, Geert Booij et al.•Lingua•1985

  • Pitch accent scaling on given, new and focused constituents in German

    Open Access•Caroline Fery, Frank Kügler•Journal of Phonetics•2008

  • Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation

    Open Access•Yi Xu, Ching X Xu•Journal of Phonetics•2005

  • Prosodic marking of information status in Dutch and Italian

    Open Access•Marc Swerts, Emiel Krahmer et al.•Journal of Phonetics•2002

  • Givenness, Avoidf and Other Constraints on the Placement of Accent

    Roger Schwarzschild•Natural Language Semantics•1999

  • A theory of focus interpretation

    Open Access•Mats Rooth•Natural Language Semantics•1992

  • Grammatical marking of givenness

    Open Access•Ivona Kučerová•Natural Language Semantics•2012

  • Expression of information structure in West Slavic

    Open Access•Radek Šimík, Marta Wierzba•Language•2017

  • Intonation

    D Robert Ladd, Dwight Bolinger•Language•1990

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae