Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How Templatic Is Arabic Input to Children? The Role of Child-Directed-Speech in the Acquisition of Semitic Morpho-Phonology

Bibliographic Data

ID10255891
AuthorsGhada Khattab (0000-0002-8451-8135, Newcastle University, corresponding author), Tamar Keren‐portnoy (0000-0002-7258-2404, University of York)
Year2026
Volume69
Issue1
Pages34-53
Publication date2026-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguage and Speech (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0023-8309 • E-ISSN: 1756-6053
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/00238309241311230
PMID39846401
OpenAlexW4406735681
LanguageEN
References cited17

Semitic languages such as Hebrew and Arabic are known for having a non-concatenative morphology: words are typically built of a combination of a consonantal root, typically tri-consonantal (e.g., k-t-b “related to writing” in Modern Standard Arabic (MSA)), with a prosodic template. Research on Hebrew language development suggests early sensitivity to frequently occurring templates. For the Arabic dialects, little is known about whether implicit sensitivity to non-concatenative morphology develops at a young age through exposure to speech, and how templatic the spoken language is in comparison to MSA. We focus on Lebanese Arabic. We hypothesized that prolonged contact with French and English may have “diluted” the salience of roots and patterns in the input. We used three different corpora of adult-directed-speech (ADS), child-directed-speech (CDS), and child speech. We analyzed the root and pattern structures in the 50 most frequent Lebanese Arabic word types in each corpus. We found fewer words with templatic patterns than expected among the most frequent words in ADS (35/50), even fewer in CDS (23/50) and still fewer in the children’s target words (15/50). In addition, only a minority contains three root consonants in their surface forms: 22 in ADS, 15 in CDS, and only 7 in words targeted by the children. We conclude that Semitic structure is less evident in either input to children or words targeted by children aged 1–3 than has been assumed. We discuss implications for the development of sensitivity to templatic structure among Lebanese-acquiring children

Arabic · Arabic languages · Cognitive psychology · Hebrew · Linguistics · Phonology · Root (linguistics · Salience (neuroscience · Semitic languages · Language Development and Disorders · Philosophy · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development

  • A First Language

    Roger Brown•First Language•1973

  • Prosodic patterns in Hebrew child-directed speech

    Open Access•Osnat Segal, Bracha Nir-Sagiv et al.•Journal of Child Language•2009

  • The relation of children's single word utterances to single word utterances in the input

    Open Access•Anat Ninio•Journal of Child Language•1992

  • Breaking into the Hebrew verb system

    Open Access•Orit Ashkenazi, Dorit Ravid et al.•First Language•2016

  • Infant Recognition of Hebrew Vocalic Word Patterns

    Open Access•Osnat Segal, Tamar Keren‐portnoy et al.•Infancy•2015

  • Explaining dynamic morphological patterns in acquisition using Network Analysis

    Open Access•Elitzur Dattner, Orit Ashkenazi et al.•Morphology•2023

  • The route to the derivational verb family in Hebrew

    Open Access•Ronit Levie, Orit Ashkenazi et al.•Morphology•2020

  • Structure and Use in the Acquisition of Word Formation

    Eve V Clark, Ruth A Berman•Language•1984

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae