Anmerkungen zu einigen Papyruskommentaren zu Pindar
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10286475 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Luca Benelli (1 Universität zu Köln (Deutschland), Institut für Altertumskunde Paul-Schallück-Strasse 3, 50939 Köln Deutschland [email protected] [email protected], corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue | 4-5 |
| Pages | 616-633 |
| Publication date | 2013-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Mnemosyne (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0026-7074 • E-ISSN: 1568-525X |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/1568525x-12341150 |
| OpenAlex | W1970470859 |
| Language | DE |
| References cited | 9 |
This article will discuss, in two separate parts, two different ancient commentaries on Pindar. The first, P. Berol. 13875, may be an abbreviated version of an original commentary of Didymos: the words πελε- / κυφ̣[ό]ρ̣αν ἵππον ( P. Berol. 13875 ll. 9-10 = Pi. Fr. Dub. 339a M.) represent a fragment of Simonides, not of Pindar. The source of Schol. in Pi. N. 4.3/5 may be an abbreviated version of Theon’s commentary on Pindar. In the second part of the article, some passages of the P. Oxy. 2451 A Fr. 2, the second commentary, will be discussed. Pi. I. 3 and 4 are two different victory odes. Thematic similarities or repetitions of individual words between the end of a poem and beginning of the following poem can also be found in the corpus of other lyric poets, especially in Sappho. Only with the order of the manuscripts do the similarities and repetitions between the end of Pi. I. 3 and the beginning of Pi. I. 4 become clear: this may have been the intention of the original Alexandrian editors
Art · Humanities · Literature · Order (exchange · Poetry · Victory · Classical Antiquity Studies · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · Law · Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|