Afterword
The usual suspects
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10344015 |
|---|---|
| Authors | A Kuper (0000-0001-6399-6958) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 81-86 |
| Publication date | 2001-04-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Patterns of Prejudice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-322X • E-ISSN: 1461-7331 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/003132201128811160 |
| PMID | 17619286 |
| OpenAlex | W2011745089 |
| Language | EN |
Anthropology has been widely identified as the colonial science par excellence. General propositions that anthropologists advanced about the nature of races, cultures or societies, or about particular populations, are supposed to have motivated and justified a variety of colonial and postcolonial policies, including even genocidal massacres. There are a number of problems with arguments of this sort. The theories of the anthropologists were diverse and much disputed, and their political views were by no means predictable or undifferentiated. Nor is it generally easy to specify the pathways by which these ideas supposedly exerted their influence
Colonialism · Epistemology · Excellence · Political science · Politics · Sociology · sort · Variety (cybernetics · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|