Time, and Time Again
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10344268 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sherry Baron (0000-0003-4000-3276), Sam Baron (Dianoia Institute of Philosophy, Australia), Yi-Cheng Lin (0000-0003-3193-524X, Dianoia Institute of Philosophy, Australia) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 259-282 |
| Publication date | 2021-06-23 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Philosophical Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8094 • E-ISSN: 1467-9213 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/pq/pqab040 |
| OpenAlex | W3177998584 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 29 |
A number of philosophers uphold a metaphysical symmetry between time and hypertime, in this sense: in so far as hypertime exists, the nature of hypertime should agree with the nature of time. Others allow that we can mix and match the metaphysics of time and hypertime. Thus, it may be that time really passes, but hypertime does not or vice versa. In this paper, we provide a preliminary defense of the mix and match approach. We outline a number of arguments for the claim that time and hypertime must share a common nature and find them all wanting
Epistemology · Metaphysics · Time travel · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
What Makes Time Special?
Objective Becoming
Thank Goodness that's Over
The Metaphysics Within Physics
Realism, anti-foundationalism and the enthusiasm for natural kinds
Can time flow at different rates? The differential passage of A-ness
Do the folk represent time as essentially dynamical
Hyper-Past Evils
I.—the Unreality of Time
Experience and the Passage of Time
The Unique Groundability of Temporal Facts
Anti‐Metaphysicalism, Necessity, and Temporal Ontology
How Fast Does Time Pass
| Citations per year | 0.4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |