Bertrand's Paradox and the Maximum Entropy Principle
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10345286 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicholas Shackel (0000-0002-1751-1400, Cardiff University), Darrell P Rowbottom (0000-0001-8226-9828, Lingnan University) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 101 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 505-523 |
| Publication date | 2019-05-18 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8205 • E-ISSN: 1933-1592 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/phpr.12596 |
| OpenAlex | W2944924184 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 24 |
An important suggestion of objective Bayesians is that the maximum entropy principle can replace a principle which is known to get into paradoxical difficulties: the principle of indifference. No one has previously determined whether the maximum entropy principle is better able to solve Bertrand's chord paradox than the principle of indifference. In this paper I show that it is not. Additionally, the course of the analysis brings to light a new paradox, a revenge paradox of the chords, that is unique to the maximum entropy principle
Entropy (arrow of time · Joint quantum entropy · Mathematical economics · Maximum entropy thermodynamics · Physics · Principle of maximum entropy · Quantum mechanics · Statistics · Mathematics · Philosophy and History of Science · Probability and Statistical Research · Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
In Defence of Objective Bayesianism
Laws and Symmetry
Probability Theory
The Foundations Of Scientific Inference
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics
Epistemic Permissiveness
Finite additivity, another lottery paradox and conditionalisation
The status of the principle of maximum entropy
Some random observations
Bertrand's Paradox and the Principle of Indifference
Defusing Bertrand’s Paradox
Paradoxes from A to Z
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |