Charitable matching and moral credit
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10345883 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Nolan (0000-0003-0055-0611, Department of Philosophy University of Notre Dame Notre Dame Indiana USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 108 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 687-696 |
| Publication date | 2023-06-18 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8205 • E-ISSN: 1933-1592 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/phpr.13005 |
| OpenAlex | W4381149618 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
When charitable matching occurs, both the person initially offering the matching donation and the person taking up the offer may well feel they have done something better than if they had donated on their own without matching. They may well feel they deserve some credit for the matched donation as well as their own. Can they both be right? Natural assumptions about charitable matching lead to puzzles that are challenging to resolve in a satisfactory way
Actuarial science · Business · Donation · Economics · Law and economics · Matching (statistics · Political science · Free Will and Agency · Law · Medicine · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|