Overbooking
Permissible when and only when scaled up
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10345945 |
|---|---|
| Authors | R Sorensen (0000-0003-1635-0980, Department of Philosophy University of Texas at Austin and Arché Research Centre at the University of St Andrews in Scotland Austin Texas USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 108 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 676-686 |
| Publication date | 2023-06-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8205 • E-ISSN: 1933-1592 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/phpr.13004 |
| OpenAlex | W4381093586 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 14 |
Bumped from a flight? Relax with this defense of the big business practice of deliberately promising more services than one will provide. On a small scale, over‐promising yields a toxic moral dilemma and a lie. At a large scale, the dilemma becomes dilute, and the lie completely disappears. Overbooking is honest because there is a sufficiently high probability of fulfilling each promise. Overbooking is socially beneficial because the promised resources are used more efficiently. There are fewer wasted seats on jumbo jets and hence cheaper tickets with less pollution. Widespread disapproval of overbooking is a fallacious scaling error. Instead of there being too much overbooking, there is too little
Business · Dilemma · Economics · Environmental economics · Epistemology · Physics · Risk analysis (engineering · Scale (ratio · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |