Perdurance and Psychological Continuity
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10348463 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Trenton Merricks (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 195-195 |
| Publication date | 2000-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8205 • E-ISSN: 1933-1592 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2653410 |
| OpenAlex | W2316854376 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 2 |
If persons endure, personal identity cannot be analyzed in terms of psychological continuity. That is one conclusion defended in my Endurance, Psychological Continuity, and the Importance of Personal Identity (PPR, 1999). Rea and Silver (PPR, 2000) claim that my argument for that conclusion is sound only if a parallel argument is sound. The parallel argument concludes that if persons perdure, personal identity cannot be analyzed in terms of psychological continuity. In this paper, I show that Rea and Silver are mistaken. My argument is sound but the parallel argument is not
Psychoanalysis · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Psychology · Theology and Philosophy of Evil
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,08 |
| Citation span | 2001 - 2015 (15) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |