Backing into Spinozism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10348792 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Samuel Newlands (University of Notre Dame, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 93 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 511-537 |
| Publication date | 2015-08-04 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8205 • E-ISSN: 1933-1592 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/phpr.12219 |
| OpenAlex | W1828384329 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 12 |
One vexing strand of Spinozism asserts that God's nature is more expansive than traditionally conceived and includes properties like being extended. In this paper, I argue that prominent early moderns embrace metaphysical principles about causation, mental representation, and modality that pressure their advocates towards such an expansive account of God's nature in similar ways. I further argue that the main early modern escape route, captured in notions like “eminent containment,” fails to adequately relieve the metaphysical pressures towards Spinozism. The upshot is that those sympathetic with these early modern projects must embrace a costlier option if they are to successfully escape the orbit of Spinoza
Causation · Epistemology · Expansive · Free will · Meaning (existential · Metaphysics · Modality (human–computer interaction · Physics · Political science · Representation (politics · Computer Science · Historical Philosophy and Science · Law · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
| Citations per year | 0.4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |