International actors and national policies
The introduction of the national care system in Uruguay
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10355301 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Meika Sternkopf (0000-0002-8192-9991, University of Bremen, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 639-661 |
| Publication date | 2024-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Policy Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0032-2687 • E-ISSN: 1573-0891 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11077-024-09543-8 |
| OpenAlex | W4401229360 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 42 |
This paper aims to understand coalition building between national and international actors in the context of an emerging subsystem. In applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework to the case of Uruguay, where a new field of social policy – the National Care System – was introduced in 2015 after a process involving different national actors from academia, civil society, politics, and administration, but also United Nations agencies, the paper explores the role of these international organizations in coalition building, and examines how a dominant coalition of national and international actors shaped the development of the new system. Using interview data and documents, the findings suggest that the involvement of international organizations in the coalition was based on shared beliefs and personal and institutional relationships. While powerful opposing coalitions were absent due to the nascent nature of the subsystem, the dominant coalition was able to influence the policy’s introduction based on their beliefs regarding gender equality and rights
Economic growth · Economics · Political science · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Policy Transfer and Learning · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies
The Advocacy Coalition Framework
The Advocacy Coalition Framework
Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches
Thematic Analysis
Institutional Change in Long-Term Care
Segregar ou incluir? Coalizões de defesa, ideias e mudanças na educação especial do Brasil
Doing Reflexive Thematic Analysis
El discurso experto sobre el cuidado desde una perspectiva de género
Beyond consensus
Comparing Care Regimes in Europe
Advocacy coalitions and policy change on nuclear power utilization in Taiwan
Advocacy coalitions and the transfer of nutrition policy to Zambia
Transfer and translation of policy
An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein
Interdependency, beliefs, and coalition behavior
Environmental policy integration in a newly established natural resource-based sector
Implementing policy integration
The rights‐based approach to care policies
The advocacy coalition framework
Drivers for Policy Agreement in Nascent Subsystems
The Advocacy Coalition Framework and Nascent Subsystems
Sharpening Advocacy Coalitions
The introduction of long-term care policy schemes
The advocacy coalition framework
The process of transfer
The Governing Left in Uruguay (2005-2015)
The National Care System in Uruguay
Building coalitions in a nascent subsystem
Human Rights and the Pink Tide in Latin America
A Perfect Storm? Welfare, Care, Gender and Generations in Uruguay
La política de cuidados en Uruguay
El aporte de las familias y las mujeres a los cuidados no remunerados en salud en Uruguay
Los cuidados en la agenda de investigación y en las políticas públicas en Uruguay
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |