Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Treating Voters as an Afterthought? The Legacies of a Decade of Electoral Modernisation in the United Kingdom

Bibliographic Data

ID10358002
AuthorsStuart Wilks‐heeg, Stuart Wilks-Heeg (0000-0003-2919-0875, University of Liverpool, corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume80
Issue1
Pages101-110
Publication date2009-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Political Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0032-3179 • E-ISSN: 1467-923X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-923x.2009.01958.x
OpenAlexW2139610373
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited2

Over the past decade, the UK's New Labour government has been at the forefront of efforts internationally to modernise electoral procedures, promising to deliver ‘an e‐enabled, multi‐channel general election by 2006’. This paper considers the origins and the impacts of reforms to UK electoral procedures with a particular focus on the adoption of postal voting on demand and pilots of electronic voting and counting since 2000. The paper concludes that the principal legacy of the modernisation agenda to date is likely to have been a negative impact on public confidence in the electoral process

Democracy · Economics · Electoral system · Government (linguistics · Modernization theory · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Principal (computer security · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Irish and British Studies · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Public Administration

  • L’industrialisation du processus électoral

    Laurence Favier•Le Genre humain•2011

  • Who are the victims of electoral fraud in Great Britain? Evidence from survey research

    Open Access•Stephen Farrall, Stuart Wilks-Heeg et al.•British Politics•2021

  • Who’s in charge? The impact of delivery and perception of risk on the willingness to voting online

    Open Access•Justin Fisher, Manu M Savani•The British Journal of Politics…•2022

  • Explaining electoral fraud in an advanced democracy

    Open Access•Eleanor Hill, Maria Sobolewska et al.•The British Journal of Politics…•2017

  • Voto eletrônico remoto (i-voto) e a pandemia de Covid-19

    Open Access•Adrián Albala, André Borges et al.•Revista de Sociologia e Política•2023

  • The Myth of Voter Fraud ‐ by Lorraine C. Minnite

    Open Access•Toby S James•Public Administration•2012

  • Public Administration and the Integrity of the Electoral Process in British Elections

    Open Access•Alistair Clark•Public Administration•2014

  • Electoral Administration and Voter Turnout

    Toby S James, Toby James•Representation•2010

  • Elections and the Internet

    Fernando Mendez•Representation•2010

  • The Public Funding of Election Administration

    Open Access•Alistair Clark•Political Studies Review•2024

  • Who Votes by Post? Understanding the Drivers of Postal Voting in the 2019 British General Election

    Open Access•Joshua Townsley, Stuart J Turnbull-Dugarte et al.•Parliamentary Affairs•2023

  • The Spill-Over and Displacement Effects of Implementing Election Administration Reforms

    Toby S James•Parliamentary Affairs•2014

  • The cost of democracy

    Open Access•Alistair Clark•International Political Science…•2019

  • Identifying the determinants of electoral integrity and administration in advanced democracies

    Open Access•Alistair Clark•European Political Science Review•2017

  • Going Postal

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Karp, Susan A Banducci•Political Behavior•2000

  • Turnout

    John Curtice•Parliamentary Affairs•2005

Citations per year0.88
Citation span2010 - 2024 (15)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae