Nowhere to Run, Nowhere to Hide? The 2010 General Election and the Defence of First‐past‐the‐post
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10359489 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard Kelly (0000-0002-0622-5644, Manchester Grammar School, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 42-49 |
| Publication date | 2011-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Political Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0032-3179 • E-ISSN: 1467-923X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-923x.2011.02165.x |
| OpenAlex | W2025695734 |
| Language | EN |
The 2010 general election threw traditional arguments about electoral reform into chaos: defenders of the status quo suddenly found themselves defending outcomes the existing system is supposed to prevent, while advocates of reform were obliged to praise outcomes arising from current arrangements. This article examines the strengths and weaknesses of first‐past‐the‐post in the light of the 2010 result and asserts that—contrary to many claims—FPTP remains a defensible electoral system. In doing so, the article highlights the peculiar political circumstances attending the last general election, while reminding readers that other recent UK elections, conducted under other electoral systems, have not been free of serious anomalies
Democracy · Electoral system · General election · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Praise · Sociology · Status quo · Strengths and weaknesses · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |