Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Nowhere to Run, Nowhere to Hide? The 2010 General Election and the Defence of First‐past‐the‐post

Bibliographic Data

ID10359489
AuthorsRichard Kelly (0000-0002-0622-5644, Manchester Grammar School, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume82
Issue1
Pages42-49
Publication date2011-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Political Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0032-3179 • E-ISSN: 1467-923X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-923x.2011.02165.x
OpenAlexW2025695734
LanguageEN

The 2010 general election threw traditional arguments about electoral reform into chaos: defenders of the status quo suddenly found themselves defending outcomes the existing system is supposed to prevent, while advocates of reform were obliged to praise outcomes arising from current arrangements. This article examines the strengths and weaknesses of first‐past‐the‐post in the light of the 2010 result and asserts that—contrary to many claims—FPTP remains a defensible electoral system. In doing so, the article highlights the peculiar political circumstances attending the last general election, while reminding readers that other recent UK elections, conducted under other electoral systems, have not been free of serious anomalies

Democracy · Electoral system · General election · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Praise · Sociology · Status quo · Strengths and weaknesses · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Psychology · Social Psychology

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae