The Quango Conundrum Revisited—Why the Government Still Needs a More Coherent Approach to Arm's‐Length Bodies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10360269 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jill Rutter (Programme Director at the Institute for Government., corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 85 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 148-152 |
| Publication date | 2014-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Political Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0032-3179 • E-ISSN: 1467-923X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-923x.12083 |
| OpenAlex | W2008525460 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
There has been substantial reform of public bodies since the Coalition government was formed in 2010. But although numbers have been reduced, there has been no attempt to address the confused landscape—indeed, departments have interpreted criteria for what should be put at arm's length in different ways, introducing further complexity. A clearer link between function and form is needed. This would help address some of the blurred lines over accountability that we have seen in the recent rows over Ofsted and the Environment Agency
Accountability · Agency (philosophy · Function (biology · Government (linguistics · Law and economics · Linguistics · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Law · Philosophy · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Public Administration
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2024 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |