Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Muting Science

Input Overload Versus Scientific Advice in Swiss Policy Making During the Covid‐19 Pandemic

Bibliographic Data

ID10360422
AuthorsKlaus Armingeon (0000-0003-4186-3155, University of Zurich, corresponding author), Fritz Sager (0000-0001-5099-6676, University of Zurich)
Year2022
Volume93
Issue3
Pages424-432
Publication date2022-05-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Political Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0032-3179 • E-ISSN: 1467-923X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1467-923x.13151
PMID35937568
OpenAlexW4281630892
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited5

This article explores why the Swiss Federal Council and the Swiss Federal Parliament were reluctant to follow the majority views of the scientific epidemiological community at the beginning of the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic. We propose an institutionalist take on this question and argue that one major explanation could be the input overload that is characteristic of the Swiss federal political system. We define input overload as the simultaneous inputs of corporatist, pluralist, federalist and direct democratic subsystems. Adding another major input-this time from the scientific subsystem-may have threatened to further erode the government's and parliament's discretionary power to cope with the pandemic. We assume that the federal government reduced its input overload by fending off scientific advice

Advice (programming · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Democracy · Federalist · Government (linguistics · Pandemic · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Computer Science · Law · Medicine · Political Science Research and Education · Public Administration

  • The devil‐angel shift in times of crisis

    Open Access•Jule Ksinsik•European Policy Analysis•2024

  • Network dynamics in public health advisory systems

    Open Access•Antoine Lemor, Éric Montpetit et al.•Governance•2025

  • Why did the influence of experts erode during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Antoine Lemor, Antoine Claude Lemor et al.•Policy & Politics•2025

  • Covid-19 Vaccination Policy Compliance in Italy and Switzerland

    Open Access•Johanna Hornung•Political Studies•2025

  • Scientists in power plays

    Open Access•Jule Ksinsik, Caroline Schlaufer•Policy Studies Journal•2025

  • Debating the politics of evidence‐based policy

    Open Access•Joshua Newman•Public Administration•2017

  • Reacting, fast and slow

    Open Access•Timon Forster, Mirko Heinzel•Journal of European Public Policy•2021

  • Blame avoidance in hard times

    Markus Hinterleitner, Céline Honegger et al.•West European Politics•2023

  • Covid-19 and the Paradox of Scientific Advice

    Open Access•Zeynep Pamuk•Perspectives on Politics•2022

  • The Rise of Citizen Groups within the Administration and Parliament in Switzerland

    Open Access•Steven Eichenberger•Swiss Political Science Review•2020

Unique citing works5
Citations per year2,5
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae