Foxhunting and the Conservatives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10360904 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Toke (Birmingham City University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 81 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 205-212 |
| Publication date | 2010-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Political Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0032-3179 • E-ISSN: 1467-923X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-923x.2010.02087.x |
| OpenAlex | W1972600433 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
The Conservatives are pledged to have a free vote in Parliament on legislation in Government time to reverse the 2004 Hunting Act. This Act bans hunting with dogs. The Countryside Alliance has opposed the Hunting Act as part of campaigns to defend its notion of rural interests. The Countryside Alliance's success in gaining the Tory pledge could be underscored by a Tory hope that hunting supporters give decisive support for Tory candidates in marginal Parliamentary constituencies. However, the Tory leadership may find it politically difficult to give early priority to legislative attempts to repeal the Hunting Act. Moreover, it is likely to require a large Tory majority and years of waiting before a Tory government is able and willing to complete a repeal of the hunting ban
Alliance · Government (linguistics · Legislation · Legislature · Parliament · Pledge · Political science · Politics · Repeal · Historical Studies of British Isles · Law · Public Administration · Rural development and sustainability
| Citations per year | 0.31 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2013 - 2024 (12) |
| Highly cited | No |