Is There a Revisionist Thesis on the Origins of the Cold War
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10380593 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Leigh (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1974 |
| Volume | 89 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 101-116 |
| Publication date | 1974-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Political Science Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0032-3195 • E-ISSN: 1538-165X |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2148117 |
| OpenAlex | W2312492517 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Recent historical analyses of the cold war have generated a critical literature which is devoted to the elaboration of categories distinguishing the different interpretations. Typically, the field has been divided into two or three contending schools: the orthodox, the revisionist, and perhaps the liberal or realist.1 Each school has been identified by its substantive historical judgments and by its historiographical assumptions. Recently some critics have acknowledged that existing categories are somewhat simpliste and have introduced further elaborations as, for example, between hard and soft revisionism.2 But despite
Cold war · Economic history · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Communism, Protests, Social Movements · Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics · History · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.02 |
| Citation span | 1984 - 1984 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |