Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Passenger Cases and the Commerce Clause

Bibliographic Data

ID10380786
AuthorsAndrew Diemer (Towson University, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume131
Issue1
Pages178-179
Publication date2016-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Science Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0032-3195 • E-ISSN: 1538-165X
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1002/polq.12439
OpenAlexW2316976602
LanguageEN

This book examines the political and legal struggles provoked by efforts at various levels of government to manage the growing number of immigrants to the United States during the decades before the Civil War. It considers the background to, the struggle over, and the consequences of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Norris v. the City of Boston and Smith v. Turner, collectively known as the Passenger Cases (1849). The antebellum politics of immigration were contentious enough, giving rise to the anti-immigrant and anti-Catholic Know-Nothing Party, but what Freyer shows is that looming behind these struggles was an even more contentious set of issues related to slavery. The power to regulate immigration, and questions about where that power resided, necessarily reflected on the power of government to control the institution of slavery. During the early years of the nineteenth century, American governments at the federal, state, and local levels sought to regulate and manage growing levels of immigration. This was particularly important in states such as New York and Massachusetts, which witnessed the highest levels of European immigration in these years. At the heart of these efforts were “alien taxes” levied on immigrants and on the captains and crews of ships carrying immigrants into port. These taxes helped support local welfare institutions, which some feared would be swamped by growing numbers of impoverished immigrants. Shipmasters would come to contest these laws, claiming that state and local governments had no right to regulate what was rightfully the responsibility of the federal government, an argument that ultimately was made before the Supreme Court in the Passenger Cases

CONTEST · Government (linguistics · Immigration · Immigration law · Immigration policy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · State (computer science · Supreme court · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Colonialism, slavery, and trade · Law

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae