Dialogue of the Deaf
How Deliberation With Discontented Citizens May Hopelessly Fail
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10389917 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anouk van Twist (0000-0003-3810-7666, School of Creative Technology Saxion University of Applied Sciences Enschede the Netherlands, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-24 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-3298 • E-ISSN: 1467-9299 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/padm.70025 |
| OpenAlex | W4414488132 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 30 |
Governments employ public deliberation in response to citizen discontent, intending to achieve consensus, mutual understanding, and clarification. However, some studies suggest that deliberation can devolve into a “dialogue of the deaf,” where parties talk past each other, counterproductively leading to conflict, distrust, and confusion. Remarkably, there is limited theoretical and empirical research on how deliberation leads to such adverse outcomes. To explore this, the study examines a Dutch city's 5G rollout that unexpectedly sparked discontent. Using documents and visual materials, the mutual communication between the local government and discontented citizens is analyzed through the theoretical lens of deliberative standards as perceived by both parties. The findings reveal that a dialogue of the deaf arises from differing perceptions of whether their interactions meet the standards of good deliberation: respect, inclusion, reason, common good orientation, reciprocity, and accountability. This research highlights the need for meta‐deliberation to address undiscussed perceptions on good deliberation
Deliberation · Deliberative democracy · Empirical research · Government (linguistics · Perception · Public policy · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Media and Politics
The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation
The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy
The Oxford Handbook of Expertise and Democratic Politics
Why and When Should We Use Public Deliberation
Governance Networks in the Public Sector
Dealing with Wicked Problems in Networks
Deliberation and polarization
Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement
Measuring Political Deliberation
Institutions of Deliberative Democratic Processes and Interest Groups
Communicative Capacity
The Guardian State
Assessing Qualitative Studies in Public Administration Research
Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World
Mechanisms of Conflict Management in Eu Regulatory Policy
Models For Research into Decision‐MakingProcesses
Conflict reconsidered
An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein
Administrative exclusion in the infrastructure‐level bureaucracy
Meta-deliberation
Emotional capital in citizen agency
Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science
Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy
Contesting Infrastructural Futures
| Highly cited | No |
|---|