Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cutback management strategies and citizen evaluation of government

Bibliographic Data

ID10392136
AuthorsCarla Flink (0000-0002-4545-2487, School of Public Affairs American University Washington DC USA), Xiaoyang Xu (0000-0002-5970-1739, McCourt School of Public Policy Georgetown University Washington DC USA, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume102
Issue2
Pages715-732
Publication date2023-06-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Administration (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-3298 • E-ISSN: 1467-9299
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/padm.12947
OpenAlexW4382698870
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited70

Through a behavioral approach, citizen evaluations of government performance have been an area of study in public administration. Research has explored how different factors influence citizens’ perceptions of public organizations, such as public sector bias and reference points. Understudied in this literature is how citizens evaluate government based on their use of financial management strategies. The Pandemic and other economic challenges have forced governments to engage in cutback management strategies to balance the budget. How do citizens evaluate governments based on their cutback strategies? To answer this theoretical question, we employ a survey experiment design with over 1600 respondents from the U.S. to explore how four cutback management strategies can influence citizen evaluations of government. Our findings suggest that cutback management strategies do influence citizens’ evaluation of government in trust, satisfaction, performance, and fairness. Citizens are more favorable to infrastructure or materials and contractor cuts than increasing taxes or reducing personnel. Further analysis by respondent partisanship indicates Democrats are more accepting of tax increases. Republicans rate governments lower when they cut capital and infrastructure and rate governments higher when they decrease personnel expenditures

Administration (probate law · Balance (ability · Business · Economics · Government (linguistics · Local government · Political science · Public economics · Public relations · Public sector · Respondent · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Psychology · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • Fairness Through Awareness

    Shaun Khurana•Public Performance & Management…•2026

  • The Future of Public Administration in the U.S.

    Kenneth J Meier•Public Performance & Management…•2026

  • Recent developments in experimental public administration

    Open Access•Rins Hylkema, Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen•International Public Management…•2026

  • Transparency and citizen satisfaction

    Ruiying Li, Qiushi Wang et al.•Public Management Review•2026

  • Thriving of Veteran Employees in Public Organizations

    Open Access•Jianglin Ke, Jingyu Hu et al.•Public Personnel Management•2026

  • Citizen evaluation of school districts

    Carla Flink, Xiaoyang Xu et al.•Journal of Public Budgeting…•2026

  • Public Perceptions of the Administrative Values Tradeoff

    Open Access•Suyeon Jo, Kenneth J Meier•Public Administration•2024

  • Examining attitudes toward public participation across sectors

    Open Access•Anna A Amirkhanyan, Fei Roberts et al.•Public Administration•2024

  • Modeling political mimetic isomorphism versus economic and quality factors in local government privatizations

    Open Access•Cristina María Campos-Alba, Jorge Chica‐olmo et al.•Public Administration•2023

  • Managing crises as if no one is watching? Governance dilemmas from a public perspective

    Open Access•Alexa Lenz•Public Administration•2024

  • Trust in institutions

    Open Access•Kim-Lee Tuxhorn, John D’attoma et al.•Journal of Behavioral Public…•2019

  • Participatory Budgeting

    Anwar Shah•Participatory budgeting•2007

  • The Perils of Balance Testing in Experimental Design

    Diana C Mutz, Robin Pemantle et al.•The American Statistician•2019

  • Bureaucrats and Politicians

    Open Access•William A Niskanen•The Journal of Law and Economics•1975

  • Experimental evidence about deficit reduction strategies

    Open Access•Jennifer N Dineen, Jennifer Dineen et al.•Journal of Public Budgeting…•2017

  • Sources of Public Service Improvement

    George A Boyne•Journal of Public Administration…•2003

  • Paying for grades

    Open Access•Gary T Henry, Ross Rubenstein•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•2001

  • Ordering Chaos

    Open Access•Carla M Flink, Carla Flink•The American Review of Public…•2017

  • Bureaucracy, inefficiency, and time

    Open Access•Paul Gary Wyckoff•Public Choice•1990

  • Organizational Responses to Municipal Budget Decreases

    Andrew D Glassberg, Andrew Glassberg•Public Administration Review•1978

  • Behavioral Public Administration

    Open Access•Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen, Sebastian Jilke et al.•Public Administration Review•2016

  • Sector Bias and the Credibility of Performance Information

    Open Access•Kenneth J Meier, Miyeon Song et al.•Public Administration Review•2021

  • Improving the performance of public organizations

    Open Access•Carla Flink, Angel Luis Molina•Public Administration•2020

  • Local Governments Managing Austerity

    Open Access•Denita Cepiku, Riccardo Mussari et al.•Public Administration•2015

  • Bureaucratic accountability in third‐party governance

    Open Access•Jaclyn Piatak, Zachary Mohr et al.•Public Administration•2017

  • The effect of human versus automated interaction on willingness to participate in government programs

    Open Access•Susan M Miller, Miyeon Song et al.•Public Administration•2022

  • The Dog That Didn't Bark

    Open Access•Kenneth J Meier, Laurence J O’toole•Public Administration•2009

  • Policy preferences in response to negative economic prospects of Covid‐19

    Open Access•Joris Van Der Voet•Public Administration•2021

  • Closing a Government Facility

    Robert D Behn•Public Administration Review•1978

  • The Timing of Managerial Responses to Fiscal Stress

    Open Access•Spencer T Brien, Robert J Eger et al.•Public Administration Review•2021

  • Pragmatic Municipalism

    Open Access•Mildred E Warner, Austin M Aldag et al.•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Political Trust, Ideology, and Public Support for Tax Cuts

    Thomas J Rudolph, Thomas Rudolph•Public Opinion Quarterly•2009

  • Explaining Why the Computer Says No

    Open Access•Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen•Public Administration Review•2022

  • Perceptual Bias and Public Programs

    Open Access•Kenneth J Meier, Austin P Johnson et al.•Public Administration Review•2019

  • The Role of Gender in Government and Nonprofit Workplaces

    Open Access•Jaclyn Piatak, Jared Mcdonald et al.•Public Administration Review•2022

  • Putting the Resource‐Based View of Strategy and Distinctive Competencies to Work in Public Organizations

    Open Access•John M Bryson, Fran Ackermann et al.•Public Administration Review•2007

  • More on Cutback Management

    Charles H Levine•Public Administration Review•1979

  • Perceptions of Public and Private Performance

    Open Access•Ulrik Hvidman, Simon Calmar Andersen•Public Administration Review•2015

  • Evaluating Urban Public Schools

    Open Access•Nathan Favero, Kenneth J Meier•Public Administration Review•2013

  • Organizational Decline and Cutback Management

    Charles H Levine•Public Administration Review•1978

  • Police Management in the 1980s

    Charles H Levine•Public Administration Review•1985

  • Contracting and Accountability in State Medicaid Reform

    Jocelyn M Johnston, Barbara S Romzek•Public Administration Review•1999

  • Fiscal Federalism and Budgetary Tradeoffs in the American States

    Open Access•Sean Nicholson-Crotty, Sean Nicholson‐crotty et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2006

  • Inequality, Self-Interest, and Public Support for “Robin Hood” Tax Policies

    Open Access•William W Franko, William Franko et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2013

  • What Do They Know, and Whom Do They Hold Accountable? Citizens in the Government-Nonprofit Contracting Relationship

    David M Van Slyke•Journal of Public Administration…•2004

  • Feeling the Squeeze

    Tina Kiefer, Jean Hartley et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2015

  • Citizen Satisfaction and the Kaleidoscope of Government Performance

    Open Access•Miyeon Song, Kenneth J Meier•Journal of Public Administration…•2018

  • Assessing the Effects of Organizational Resources on Public Agency Performance

    Y Lee, Sang Yun Lee et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2013

  • Citizens’ Evaluations of the Public Sector

    Open Access•Ulrik Hvidman•Journal of Public Administration…•2019

  • Why Public Financial Management Matters

    N Kioko, Sharon N Kioko et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2011

  • Policy Stability and Organizational Performance

    C Andersen, Simon Calmar Andersen et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2010

  • Representative Bureaucracy in Policing

    Norma M Riccucci, Gregg G Van Ryzin et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2014

  • Unconscious Bias in Citizens’ Evaluations of Public Sector Performance

    John D Marvel•Journal of Public Administration…•2015

  • Representative Bureaucracy and Attitudes Toward Automated Decision Making

    Open Access•Susan M Miller, Lael R Keiser•Journal of Public Administration…•2021

  • Policy venue preference and relative trust in government in federal systems

    Open Access•Suzanne Leland, Jacqueline Chattopadhyay et al.•Governance•2021

  • Guns versus Butter

    Alex Mintz, Chi Huang•American Journal of Political…•1991

  • Political Trust, Ideology, and Public Support for Government Spending

    Thomas J Rudolph, Thomas Rudolph et al.•American Journal of Political…•2005

  • Both Guns and Butter, or Neither

    Kevin Narizny•American Political Science Review•2003

  • Adaptive Signal Processing, Hierarchy, and Budgetary Control in Federal Regulation

    Open Access•Daniel Carpenter, Daniel P Carpenter•American Political Science Review•1996

  • Guns Versus Butter

    Open Access•Alex Mintz•American Political Science Review•1989

Unique citing works10
Citations per year3,33
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae