Congress and the Supreme Court During the Marshall Era
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10433223 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert J Steamer (corresponding author), Robert Steamer |
| Year | 1965 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 364-385 |
| Publication date | 1965-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Review of Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-6705 • E-ISSN: 1748-6858 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034670500005647 |
| OpenAlex | W1976210213 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
ALTHOUGH the dynamics of American politics demand perpetual and creative alterations in the constitutional system, the building of the original complex of arrangements on the foundation provided by the framers was probably the most precarious undertaking in America's history. It was the task of Congress to turn the blueprint for a government into an operating reality, and all at one time. Any structural weakness might have brought down the entire edifice or, at least, would have forced some rebuilding at a later time under new stresses and strains. The establishment of the Supreme Court was peculiarly significant since, paradoxically, the Constitution deemed it as coordinate and co-equal with the Presidency and the Congress, and yet the Court was a creature of Congress in the sense that its detailed form and substance depended upon a statutory enactment. Had the framers spelled out in Article III the precise structure of a federal judicial system, prescribed the detailed nature of the Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction, and explicitly authorized judicial review, much of the conflict which continues to this day might have been avoided. Instead, the Constitution left these important questions open to legislative discretion and the stage was set for frequent legislative-judicial altercations which at times have almost reached an irreparable constitutional crisis
Constitution · Constitutional crisis · Discretion · Federalism · Judicial activism · Judicial Independence · Judicial review · Jurisdiction · Legislature · Original jurisdiction · Political question · Political science · Politics · Presidency · Separation of powers · Supreme court · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |