Time and the Problem of Royal Succession in Shakespeare's History Plays
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10433488 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John D Cox (0000-0003-3561-2982, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 78 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 609-624 |
| Publication date | 2016-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Review of Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-6705 • E-ISSN: 1748-6858 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034670516000619 |
| OpenAlex | W2525880706 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
Shakespeare's most innovative genre was the history play, because it has no precedent in either classical or medieval tradition. In contrast to the focused teleology of Christian medieval drama, Shakespeare's history plays manifest an implicit idea of history that was secular, political, and open-ended. They emphasize human action in a political arena, where the criterion for success is the ability to act in time, without regard to one's spiritual state. Time determines royal succession, which is the focus of all Shakespeare's history plays, as it was the focus of political concern in England in the 1590s, when the plays were written. His emphasis on time and royal succession distinguishes his implied political theory from the moralism and authoritarianism of official Tudor state doctrine on one hand and from the pragmatism of Machiavelli on the other
Art · Authoritarianism · Democracy · Doctrine · Drama · Epistemology · Focus (optics · Literature · Political history · Political science · Politics · State (computer science · Teleology · Theology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Historical Art and Culture Studies · History · Law · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |