Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Order of Presentation and the Order of Understanding in Aquinas's Account of Law

Bibliographic Data

ID10435107
AuthorsTom W Smith (0000-0001-9329-6880, corresponding author), Thomas W Smith
Year1995
Volume57
Issue4
Pages607-640
Publication date1995-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Review of Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0034-6705 • E-ISSN: 1748-6858
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0034670500018659
OpenAlexW2073628925
LanguageEN
References cited15

It is argued that natural law can be known without the aid of revelation, and so it seems to be a medium through which people of different faiths can live together and talk to each other. However, Leo Strauss argues that Aquinas's understanding of natural law cannot possibly provide such a medium because Thomas relies on Christian revelation to develop his account of natural law. To counter this claim, this article makes a distinction between the way Aquinas presents his natural law teaching to his readers in a discussion of revelation and the way he thinks human beings may come to know natural law independent of special revelation. This distinction leads to a consideration of the deepest issue dividing Strauss and Aquinas: their rival accounts of the relationship of philosophy to theology

Black letter law · Comparative law · Divine law · Economics · Epistemology · Natural (archaeology · Natural law · Natural order · Order (exchange · Philosophy of law · Political science · Presentation (obstetrics · Private law · Revelation · Theology · History · Law · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Medieval Philosophy and Theology · Philosophy · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

  • Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy

    Leo Strauss•Studies in Platonic Political…•1983

  • Natural Right and History

    Leo Strauss•Natural Right and History…•1965

  • Basic Writings of St. Thomas Aquinas

    Henri Renard•The Modern Schoolman•1945

  • Maimonides, Aquinas and Gersonides on Providence and evil

    Open Access•David B Burrell, David Burrell•Religious Studies•1984

  • Thomism and Aristotelianism

    John Wild, Harry V Jaffa•The Philosophical Review•1953

  • Nuclear deterrence, morality and realism

    Arthur Hockaday•International Affairs•1987

  • Response to Hall

    Open Access•E A Goerner, E Goerner•Political Theory•1990

  • The New Rights Theory and the Natural Law

    Open Access•Ernest L Fortin•The Review of Politics•1982

  • On the Naturalness and Lawfulness of the Natural Law

    Open Access•E A Goerner, E Goerner•The Review of Politics•1983

  • On Homistic Natural Law the Bad Man's View of Thomistic Natural Right

    Open Access•E A Goerner, E Goerner•Political Theory•1979

  • The Revenge of God

    David Martins, David Martin et al.•British Journal of Sociology•1996

  • Multiculturalism and the Problem of Particularism

    Open Access•Joshua Parens•American Political Science Review•1994

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae