Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Liberalism and Locke's Philosophical Anthropology

Bibliographic Data

ID10437150
AuthorsGraedon Zorzi (0000-0001-7908-0100, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume81
Issue2
Pages183-205
Publication date2019-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Review of Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0034-6705 • E-ISSN: 1748-6858
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0034670518001183
OpenAlexW2929779973
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited30

Perhaps in part because of an issue related to chronology of publications, the connections between Locke's liberalism and philosophical anthropology are underappreciated. This essay addresses that issue and re-examines Locke's account of the person, treating it as an interpretive key to Locke's political thought. Locke's person is, contra the standard readings, a relational concept that refers to beings capable of law in terms of their accountability to law; descendants of Adam are equal as persons in that they hold identical rights (or prerogatives) and duties under the divine law. This philosophical anthropology leads to a principle—eschatological accountability delimits legitimate moral and political authority, so authority over a person is necessarily limited by that person's accountability to God—that helps to clarify certain misunderstandings of the status of moral authority within Lockean liberalism and to explain how Locke set the terms of subsequent debates about the limits of political authority

Accountability · Classical liberalism · Epistemology · Liberalism · Political anthropology · Political authority · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Historical Philosophy and Science · Law · Philosophy · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

  • Natural Teleology in John Locke’s Ethics

    Open Access•Graedon Zorzi•The Historical Journal•2024

  • John Locke's Liberalism

    Ruth W Grant•John Locke's Liberalism•1987

  • Why Liberalism Failed

    Open Access•Patrick J Deneen•Why Liberalism Failed•2018

  • Locke

    Open Access•John Locke, Peter Laslett et al.•Locke•1997

  • The Political Thought of John Locke

    Open Access•J Dunn•Political Thought of John Locke•1969

  • Locke and Leibniz on Substance

    Maria Rosa Antognazza, Paul Lodge et al.•Locke and Leibniz on Substance•2015

  • God, Locke, and Equality

    Open Access•Jeremy Waldron•God, Locke, and Equality•2002

  • Two Treatises of Government, by John Locke, Peter Laslett

    Open Access•Rosalie L Colie•Political Science Quarterly•1961

  • Moral Science and the Concept of Persons in Locke

    Ruth Mattern•The Philosophical Review•1980

  • The Biblical Politics of John Locke

    Open Access•Eldon J Eisenach•Canadian Journal of Political…•2005

  • Voluntarism and Early Modern Science

    Open Access•Peter Harrison•History of Science•2002

  • Locke on Personal Identity

    Open Access•Shelley Weinberg•Philosophy Compass•2011

  • Obligation and Consent-II

    Open Access•Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, Hanna Pitkin•American Political Science Review•1966

  • Obligation and Consent-I

    Open Access•Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, Hanna Pitkin•American Political Science Review•1965

  • The Passions and the Interests

    Albert O Hirschman, Amartya Sen et al.•Passions and the Interests•1977

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae