Government Control of Labor Representation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10437285 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David A Mccabe, David Mccabe (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1941 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 479-493 |
| Publication date | 1941-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Review of Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-6705 • E-ISSN: 1748-6858 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034670500002059 |
| OpenAlex | W1999339163 |
| Language | EN |
The question has repeatedly obtruded itself in the past four years whether the recent legislation intended to prevent employer denial of collective bargaining to employees necessarily leads to a degree of government control over labor representation previously unknown in this country. In facing this question there is no implication that government control over worker organization was intended. The purpose behind the legislation was undoubtedly to prevent interference by employers with the organization of workers and refusal by employers of collective bargaining. Nevertheless, the entrance of the government into the field to prevent employer interference with worker representation has apparently led also to the curtailment of the freedom of the workers in this sphere
Business · Collective bargaining · Control (management · Denial · Economics · Field (mathematics · Government (linguistics · Labor relations · Labour economics · Legislation · Management · Political science · Politics · Representation (politics · Labor Movements and Unions · Law · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |