Denazifying the Reich
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10437287 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elmer Plischke (0000-0002-2019-9243, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1947 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 153-172 |
| Publication date | 1947-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Review of Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-6705 • E-ISSN: 1748-6858 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034670500045320 |
| OpenAlex | W2097338390 |
| Language | EN |
“What shall be done with Germany upon her defeat?” For many months prior to the surrender of the Wehrmacht this vital question evoked a host of conflicting proposals, official and unofficial, in both Military Government planning staffs and in higher policy-formation circles. Despite many differences, these proposals uniformly demanded immediate disarmament, demilitarization, and—denazification. Early plans called for the occupation of Germany with the objective of insuring that she never again would threaten her neighbors and the rest of the world. The demilitarization and disarmament of the German armed forces was undertaken rapidly and resolutely by our occupation forces and those of our Allies as a preliminary step in securing this objective. But the more difficult task of denazification—that is, the permanent elimination of the institutions, leadership, and psychology in German life which produced and supported the Nazi regime—is still far from completed
Disarmament · German · Government (linguistics · Nazi Germany · Nazism · Political science · Politics · Surrender · World War II · History · Intelligence, Security, War Strategy · Law · Military History and Strategy · Nuclear Issues and Defense · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |