Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Parent Diaries and the Child Study Movement in Late Imperial and Early Soviet Russia

Bibliographic Data

ID10479604
AuthorsAndy Byford (0000-0002-3251-3033, Durham University, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume72
Issue2
Pages212-241
Publication date2013-03-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Russian Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0036-0341 • E-ISSN: 1467-9434
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/russ.10689
OpenAlexW2040194746
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited1

Parent diaries of child development and early upbringing–sometimes referred to as “mothers' diaries”–are an important source in the historiography of Russian childhood. The article situates the production of Russian parent diaries, as practice and discourse, in the history of the Russian child study movement between the 1880s and the 1930s. It traces the key socio‐cultural and professional contexts in which parent diaries were initially promoted in Russia between the Great Reforms and the First World War. It discusses in greater detail two diaries published in the mid‐1910s (those of A. F. Levonevskii and E. K. Krichevskaia) as examples of very different kinds of positioning of Russian parents on the boundaries of expertise in early child development, care and education ( vospitanie ). It then analyzes the way in which some Russian psychologists (especially N. A. Rybnikov) enrolled parental diary‐keeping as an “objective” methodology in psychology in the late 1910s‐early 1920s. In this context, it examines, as a counter‐example, the idiosyncratic framing of the diary written by V. A. Rybnikova‐Shilova (1923), in which, unusually, maternal subjectivity was explicitly built into the scientific legitimacy of a child development diary. The conclusion sketches out the fate of parent diaries, especially as a method and genre of psychology, up until and beyond the 1936 liquidation of Soviet pedology under Stalin

Epistemology · Framing (construction · Historiography · Legitimacy · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Subjectivity · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies · Gender Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · History · Law · Psychology

  • V. M. Bekhterev in Russian Child Science, 1900s–1920s

    Open Access•Andy Byford•Journal of the History of the…•2016

  • Restoring Teachers to Their Rights

    Open Access•E Thomas Ewing•History of Education Quarterly•2001

Citations per year0.1
Citation span2016 - 2016 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae