The haecceity effect
On the aesthetics of cinephiliac moments
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10495685 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jordan Schonig (0000-0002-3554-6631, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 255-271 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Screen (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0036-9543 • E-ISSN: 1460-2474 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/screen/hjaa016 |
| OpenAlex | W3036532122 |
| Language | EN |
Humphrey Bogart pauses to look up at a sign while walking across the street in The Big Sleep (Howard Hawks, 1946); Lauren Bacall clutches and unclutches her chair in the background of a scene in Key Largo (John Huston, 1948); Jeffrey Hunter attempts to leap onto John Wayne’s horse, then seemingly levitates for an instant in The Searchers (John Ford, 1956); a bowling pin twirls, pauses, then falls – as if to its death – in Scarface (Howard Hawks, 1932).1 Singled out by cinephiles for the inexplicable pleasure they produce, each of these moments typifies what many critics and theorists have identified as a ‘cinephiliac moment’, a brief fragment from a film that compels rapturous and loving description, and resists systematic analysis. As Christian Keathley explains, ‘Whether it is the gesture of a hand, the odd rhythm of a horse’s gait, or the sudden change in expression on a face’, cinephiliac moments involve ‘the fetishizing of fragments of a film, either individual shots or marginal (often unintentional) details [...] that appear only for a moment’.2
Aesthetics · Art · Art history · Computer security · Expression (computer science · Face (sociological concept · Gesture · Key (lock · Linguistics · Moment (physics · Pleasure · Psychoanalysis · Sign (mathematics · Cinema and Media Studies · Computer Science · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism · Theatre and Performance Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|