Genetic screening and genetic counseling
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices in two groups of family planning professionals
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10518482 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Edwin W Naylor (University at Buffalo, State University of New York, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1975 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 304-314 |
| Publication date | 1975-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Biology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-766X |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/19485565.1975.9988187 |
| PMID | 1233731 |
| OpenAlex | W2071422455 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 4 |
67 obstetrical and gynecological physicians and 102 professional staff members of family planning clinics (FPCs) in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, area returned questionnaires relating to knowledge of basic genetic principles and attitudes towards genetic screening and genetic counseling. The best understood genetic risk was Down's syndrome in children born to mothers over 40 years of age. Nearly 90% of physicians and 85% of FPC staff knew this but only 12% of physicians and 30% of FPC staff knew it is caused by chromosomal aberration. Next best understood defect is sickle cell anemia. In overall knowledge the physicians had a mean score of 4.45 of 7 genetic questions, FPC staff, 3.32. However, FPC workers who had received in-service genetic training scored 4.42 (p less than .001). Knowledge of the 2 genetic clinics in the area and acceptance of the principles of genetic screening were associated with the individual's acceptance of sterilization as a method of birth control and acceptance of abortion if the fetus had significant risk of being born deformed. Both of these associations were at the significant level for both physicians and FPC workers. Both physicians and FPC workers who have themselves had genetic counseling or who have family members who have had such counseling show higher acceptance levels. An association was also found between acceptance and genetic educational background. About 92% of respondents who had read articles or textbooks pertaining to genetics during the preceding year approved of including genetic information as part of maternal and child health projects compared with 82% of those who had not (p less than .02). Among the physicians 36% felt it should be required, 34% voluntary, and 30% did not know; for FPC workers, 59, 27, and 14%, respectively. Protestants and Jews tended to favor required premarital screening while Catholics tended to oppose it (p less than .007). It is disconcerting that over 50% of the physicians did not know the recurrence risk of PKU and over 20% did not know the gene is the basic unit of inheritance. While it is true that over 1/2 completed basic professional education more than 20 years ago when genetics was not part of the medical school curriculums this basic knowledge needs to have been acquired during continuing medical education. In this study more than 1/3 of the FPC staff indicated they had been asked to provide genetic counseling or had referred clients. This points up the importance of such workers in a comprehensive genetic counseling service
Abortion · Environmental health · Family medicine · Family planning · Genetic counseling · Genetic testing · Population · Pregnancy · BRCA gene mutations in cancer · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Genetics · Medicine · Nursing · Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.06 |
| Citation span | 1978 - 1988 (11) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |