Hidden Bias
Social Service Professionals’ Attitudes toward Physical Disability
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10550374 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Aleksa Owens (0000-0003-3620-7081, University of Nevada, Reno, corresponding author), Aleksa Owen (School of Social Work, University of Nevada Aleksa Owen, PhD, LMSW, is assistant professor, , Reno, 1664 North Virginia Street, Building AB, Room 523A, Reno, NV 89557, USA), Charlotte Friedman (0000-0002-7150-4041, Council on Environmental Quality), Carli Friedman (The Council on Quality and Leadership Carli Friedman, PhD, is director of research, , Towson, MD, USA) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 71 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 129-138 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Work (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-8046 • E-ISSN: 1545-6846 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/sw/swag006 |
| PMID | 41762636 |
| OpenAlex | W7132828548 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 44 |
Implicit social cognition, also known as implicit bias, may impact social work practice. Because social workers commonly work with people with disabilities, it is important to understand more about social service professionals' attitudes about physical disability. By using descriptive and inferential statistical tests to quantitatively analyze secondary 2023 data from social service professionals, including social workers and counselors (n = 5,167), this study found that 70.3 percent of respondents reported having no explicit preference for people with or without physical disabilities, 23.7 percent reported preferring people without physical disabilities explicitly, and 6.0 percent reported preferring people with physical disabilities explicitly. For implicit attitudes, most participants had implicit preference for people without physical disabilities (77.8 percent), 13.7 percent had no implicit preference for people with or without physical disabilities, and 8.5 percent implicitly preferred people with physical disabilities. There was a statistically significant relationship between explicit and implicit attitudes, with most people having discordant explicit and implicit attitudes, often with low levels of explicit bias and high levels of implicit bias. This study also found age, gender, disability, having friends/family with disabilities, education, and political orientation correlated with explicit and implicit disability attitudes. The article ends with a discussion of educational interventions to reduce disability-related implicit bias
Implicit attitude · Implicit bias · Implicit personality theory · Physical disability · Preference · Psychological intervention · Disability Education and Employment · Disability Rights and Representation · Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport · Social Work
Disability Theory
Multiple Regression Approach to Analyzing Contingency Tables
Implicit Bias
Disability in a Human Rights Context
A Multitrait-Multimethod Validation of the Implicit Association Test
Implicit Attitude Measures
A model of dual attitudes
Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes
Expanding Ableism
Preparation of Social Workers to Support People with Developmental Disabilities
Beyond Ramps, Curb Cuts, and Captions
Long-term reduction in implicit race bias
Psychotherapy Experiences of U.S. Adults With Physical Disabilities
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition
Applying a social model of disability across the life span
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |