Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Organising Unorganised Workers

The Case of Bindery Workers in Calcutta

Bibliographic Data

ID10560175
AuthorsBiswajit Ghosh (0000-0002-8617-8250, Department of Sociology M.B.B. College, Tripura, corresponding author)
Year1988
Volume37
Issue1-2
Pages97-112
Publication date1988-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociological Bulletin (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-0229 • E-ISSN: 2457-0257
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0038022919880107
OpenAlexW2593124468
LanguageEN

This paper 1 focuses on the problems and prospects of mobilizing workers in the 'unorganised sector' of Indian industry. Till recently, it used to be considered difficult, if not impossible, for trade unions to mobilise workers in the 'unorganised sector' for collective action. The small size of industrial units, intimate and informal work relationships, dispersal of industrial units over, a large area and workers' low level of education were considered to be some of the major obstacles to trade union activity. This view now needs to be revised in the light of numerous reports of successful trade union activities in the bidi (Basu, 1977; Avachat, 1978; Mohandas, 1980), coir (Issac, 1982), and construction (Johri and Pandey, 1972) industries. These reports point to the crucial role played by cadrebased political parties in launching strikes and demonstrations. But now there is a need for undertaking deeper studies to assess the long term viability of such trade union activities and their social implications. It is with this intention that an attempt is made here to grasp the problems and prospects of mobilising workers in the binderies of central Calcutta. To begin with, a few conceptual clarifications are necessary. The pairs of terms, 'organised' and 'unorganised' sector or 'formal' and 'informal' sector, may give a misleading view of the socio-economic structure of industry in India as consisting of autonomous, if not autarkic circuits of economic activities. Following such a view, an inference may be made regarding the qualitative distinctions in regard to labour problems, and hence of trade unions, between the 'organised' and 'unorganised' sectors. It is the contention of this paper that unless the socio-economic linkages that connect the 'unorganised sector' to the 'organised sector' and to the political system are taken into account, it is not possible to appreciate the constraints on trade union activities in the 'unorganised sector'. Further, the nature of the working class can be properly understood only when such interconnections are taken into account

Geography · Political science · Research methodology · Sex workers · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Demography · Indian Economic and Social Development · Labor Movements and Unions

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae