Beware the source text

Five (re)translations of the same work, but from different source texts

Bibliographic Data

ID10607144
AuthorsLaura Ivaska (0000-0002-6998-5077, University of Turku, Turku, Finland), Suvi Huuhtanen (no affiliation*)
Year2021
Volume65
Issue2
Pages312-331
Publication date2021-03-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMeta Journal des traducteurs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0026-0452 • E-ISSN: 1492-1421
PublisherConsortium Erudit (PUBLISHER • CA)
DOI10.7202/1075838ar
OpenAlexW3150152154
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited45

Source text (ST), although a central concept in translation studies, has remained vaguely defined. This complicates the identification of a translation’s ST, which in turn creates problems for research. Associating translations with the incorrect ST(s) leads to questionable conclusions and categorizations, especially when dealing with the types of translation that are defined and theorized with reference to their relationship with their ST(s), such as retranslation, indirect translation, pseudotranslation and self-translation. Our case study of five Finnish translations of Jules Verne’s Vingt mille lieues sous les mer demonstrates that these assumed retranslations have different STs. We adopt the notions of work and text to establish the relationships among the translations and STs involved: texts are representations of a work , and a work , in turn, is a literary creation implied by its various texts . Although the five Finnish translations have different source texts , they are all – as are their STs – texts of the same work . In other words, if source text is understood to be a text , the five translations are not, strictly speaking, retranslations; however, if source text is understood to be a work , then they are all retranslations of the same work . Therefore, the categorization of these translations – and thus also the points of view from which they can be studied – depends on whether source text is defined as a text or as a work

Categorization · Identification (biology) · Linguistics · Source text · Target text · Translation (biology) · Translation studies · Computer Science · Digital Humanities and Scholarship · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Translation Studies and Practices

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access