The Topos of Critical Rejection in the Renaissance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10614075 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Frank L Borchardt |
| Year | 1966 |
| Volume | 81 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 476 |
| Publication date | 1966-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Modern Language Notes (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0149-6611 • E-ISSN: 2326-1978 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2908074 |
| OpenAlex | W2333319314 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
invested with the Empire (Kallen, pp. 342, 346). The content and merit of Cusanus' stand is not at issue here. The manner in which he made his stand is. The Cardinal found it necessary to deny a virtually unquestioned tradition in order to lend weight to a less widely accepted but perhaps more practical view. In classical antiquity, the convention of rejecting a mythological or historical tradition in favor of a presumably more enlightened view was so established as to receive from the rhetoricians a distinctive nomen
Art · Art history · Literature · The Renaissance · Topos theory · Historical and Linguistic Studies · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.11 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2017 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |