Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

What’s your Opinion? Negation and ‘Weak’ Attitude Verbs

Dados Bibliográficos

ID10687874
AutoresHerbert I Schiller (0000-0001-7229-9337, University of Sheffield, autor correspondente), Henry Ian Schiller (The University of Sheffield , UK)
Ano2023
Volume73
Fascículo4
Páginas1141-1161
Data de publicação2023-09-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoThe Philosophical Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0031-8094 • E-ISSN: 1467-9213
EditoraOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/pq/pqad049
OpenAlexW4367680153
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas17

Attitude verbs like ‘believe’ and ‘want’ exhibit neg-raising: an ascription of the form a doesn’t believe that p tends to convey that a disbelieves—i.e., believes the negation of—p. In ‘Belief is Weak’, Hawthore et al. observe that neg-raising does not occur with verbs like ‘know’ or ‘need’. According to them, an ascription of the form a believes that p is true just in case a is in a belief state that makes p more likely than not, and so—excepting cases of complete indifference—a will either believe p or disbelieve p. I expand and revise this explanation: so-called ‘weak’ attitude verbs are used in ascriptions of an opinion about some subject matter S—a kind of selection from among the elements of S—and these ascriptions are themselves responsive to conversational topics that presuppose that the subject of the ascription has an opinion about S. ‘Strong’ attitude verbs denote more direct relationships between subject and world

Ascription · Epistemology · Linguistics · Negation · Raising (metalworking) · Selection (genetic algorithm) · Subject (documents) · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Advocacy and the function of folk psychology

    Open Access•Herbert I Schiller•Mind & Language•2026

  • Classical NEG Raising

    Chris Collins, Paul M Postal•Classical Neg Raising An Essay On…•2014

  • Belief is weak

    Open Access•John Hawthorne, Daniel Rothschild et al.•Philosophical Studies•2016

  • Logic and Conversation

    H P Grice•Speech Acts•1975

  • A New Hope

    Kyle Blumberg, John Hawthorne et al.•The Journal of Philosophy•2022

  • Conversational Exculpature

    Daniel Hoek•The Philosophical Review•2018

  • The Attitudes We Can Have

    Daniel Drucker•The Philosophical Review•2020

  • Full Belief and Loose Speech

    Sarah Mo, Sarah Moss•The Philosophical Review•2019

  • Belief as Question‐Sensitive

    Open Access•Seth Yalcin•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2016

  • Knowing the Answer

    Open Access•Jonathan Schaffer•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2007

  • Pragmatic Particularism

    Open Access•Ray Buchanan, Herbert I Schiller•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2021

  • Neg-Raising and Neg movement

    Open Access•Paul Crowley•Natural Language Semantics•2019

  • A Question-Sensitive Theory of Intention

    Open Access•Bob Beddor, Simon Goldstein•The Philosophical Quarterly•2023

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano1
Intervalo de citações2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae